TREATMENT OF MACULAR EDEMA- WHAT'S NEW? EVIDENCE FROM AN HTA STUDY COMPARING RANIBIZUMAB AND DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT
Author(s)
Ferrario L1, Foglia E1, Bandello F2, Ferri C2, Figini I3, Franzin M2, Gambaro G3, Introini U2, Medaglia M4, Staurenghi G4, Tadini P2, Croce D5
1LIUC University, Castellanza, Italy, 2Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy, 3Valduce Hospital Como, Como, Italy, 4Hospital Authority L. Sacco, Milano, Italy, 5University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
OBJECTIVES: Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss and blindness. The aim of the study is the evaluation of the benefits concerning the introduction of an additional alternative technology, Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX), in comparison with the present scenario consisting of the repeated administration of intravitreal injections of Ranibizumab. They differ for the number of injections and adverse events (AEs) occurring after each therapeutic cycle. METHODS: An HTA was conducted within 3 Italian Departments of Ophthalmology, in Lombardy Region. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected using specific validated questionnaires and self-reported interviews, applying a MCDA approach and considering 7 dimensions resulting from the EUnetHTA Core Model. RESULTS: At the 36 month time point of the base-case scenario for market penetration, the introduction of DEX could lead to i) significant economic savings to the Regional Health Service (-15%), even considering the AEs impacts (14.82% severe AEs for Ranibizumab vs
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)
Code
PSS75
Topic
Health Technology Assessment
Topic Subcategory
Decision & Deliberative Processes
Disease
Sensory System Disorders