THE IMPACT OF HEALTHCARE POLICY BASED ON DRUG PLAN PERSPECTIVE VERSUS THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH PERSPECTIVE- A CASE STUDY OF THE ODPRN RECOMMENDATIONS OF RESTRICTING REIMBURSEMENT OF TESTOSTERONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY FOR HYPOGONADISM IN ONTARIO ...

Author(s)

Hubert MM1, Karellis A1, Stutz M1, Grober E2, Greenberg D3, Sampalis JS4
1JSS Medical Research, Saint-Laurent, QC, Canada, 2Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Saint-Joseph Health Center, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4JSS Medical Research Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

OBJECTIVES: The Ontario Drug Policy Research Network (ODPRN) published recommendations to restrict reimbursement and coverage criteria of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in Ontario. The ODPRN’s budget impact analysis (BIA) evaluated: no reimbursement change (option A), restricting coverage of all forms of TRT (option B), restricting oral and topical forms only (option C), or restricting topical forms only (option D). The analysis assumed exponential growth of TRT expenditures and inappropriate use in 7%-46% of patients. The analysis was limited to drug prescription costs and excluded other costs affected by the recommendations, resulting in forecasted savings ranging from $7-$16 million over a 3-year period. JSS Medical Research performed the BIA from the ministry of health perspective. METHODS: Our hybrid epidemiological and claims-based BIA included costs of TRTs and key cost drivers of physician visits, administering injectable TRTs, testosterone level testing and Exceptional Access Program evaluation and processing. Ontario prescription drug expenditures based on claims data, as well as published literature and expert opinion were utilized. We evaluated the impact of the ODPRN scenarios with and without inappropriate TRT use over a 3-year period. RESULTS: Based on the JSS assumption of all patients qualifying for TRT and taking into consideration key cost drivers, option B would cost $1.01 million; option C $766,000, and option D $252,000. Using ODPRN assumptions of inappropriate use, JSS forecasted savings of $373,000-$13.4 million as opposed to savings of $7-$16 million forecasted by the ODPRN. CONCLUSIONS: ODPRN savings exclude key cost drivers and assume a greater magnitude of inappropriate use. The burden of the policy change could completely offset savings and generate costs of up to $1 million to the healthcare budget. Healthcare policy recommendations based on drug costs alone underestimate the true cost, shifting and in this case creating additional costs to other areas of the healthcare system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

PDB118

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Health Technology Assessment, Organizational Practices

Topic Subcategory

Academic & Educational, Approval & Labeling, Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Formulary Development, Health Disparities & Equity, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Prescribing Behavior, Pricing Policy & Schemes, Reimbursement & Access Policy, Risk-sharing Approaches

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Geriatrics, Reproductive and Sexual Health

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×