THE CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC BURDEN OF SKELETAL RELATED EVENTS IN AUSTRIA, CZECH REPUBLIC, GERMANY, GREECE, ITALY, SPAIN AND SWITZERLAND- A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE USE OF DENOSUMAB AND ZOLEDRONIC ACID IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER AND BONE MET ...

Author(s)

Cristino J1, Diel I2, Finek J3, Perez Encinas M4, Maniadakis N5, Ikenberg R6, Campos Tapias I7, Jandova P8, Zahn DP9, Moser C10, Bolognese L11, Tritaki G12, Gatta F1, Hechmati G1
1Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland, 2Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany, 3Clinic of Oncology and radiotherapy (FN v PLZN), Plzen, Czech Republic, 4Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain, 5Department of Health Services Organization, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece, 6Amgen GmbH, Munich, Germany, 7Amgen SA, Barcelona, Spain, 8Amgen s.r.o, Praha, Czech Republic, 9Amgen Switzerland AG, Zug, Switzerland, 10Amgen GmbH, Vienna, Austria, 11Amgen Srl, Milan, Italy, 12AMGEN Hellas Ltd, Athens, Greece

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the total number of skeletal-related events (SREs) prevented, related hospital burden and direct medical expenditure when denosumab is used instead of zoledronic acid for SRE prevention in seven European countries. METHODS: A model was developed combining country-specific breast cancer mortality data from the World Health Organization or from local registries, the proportion of metastatic breast cancer patients with bone metastases (BMs) at high risk of developing SREs from published literature, the prevalence of breast cancer with BMs was derived assuming a steady state approach (with incidence equivalent to mortality of metastatic disease), and the average survival for metastatic breast cancer patients from published literature. Annual SRE rates from a European observational retrospective study and the treatment effect observed in a head-to-head clinical trial of denosumab versus zoledronic acid were used to estimate the total number of predicted SREs by treatment option. Country-specific findings from two retrospective studies were used to estimate the total number of hospitalisations, inpatient days and direct medical costs associated with the management of SREs.  RESULTS: Across all countries, the estimated prevalence of breast cancer patients with BMs was 87,592 patients: Austria, 3,253; Czech Republic, 3,509; Germany, 37,895; Greece, 4,639; Italy, 27,767; Spain, 7,553; and Switzerland, 2,975. When denosumab was the selected treatment option, 36,324 SREs were estimated to be avoided per year compared with the use of zoledronic acid, which would save 24,110 hospitalisations, 536,551 inpatient days and 206,605,754€ of direct medical costs (2014 costs in €: Austria, 23,890,554; Czech Republic, 5,779,856; Germany, 60,659,628; Greece, 15,941,728; Italy, 39,998,970; Spain, 17,249,548; and Switzerland, 43,085,469).  CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab’s clinical superiority in the prevention of SREs over zoledronic acid could result in significant savings in the number and duration of hospitalisations, reducing direct medical costs associated with the management of SREs in Europe.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

PCN299

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×