HEALTH-ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF A GNRH-ANTAGONIST (DEGARELIX) VS. GNRH-AGONISTS CONSIDERING THE NUMBER-NEEDED-TO-TREAT TO AVOID CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS
Author(s)
Anderson D1, Donatz V2, Vosgerau S2
1Ecker + Ecker GmbH, Hamburg, Germany, 2Ferring Arzneimittel, Kiel, Germany
OBJECTIVES: Recent studies suggest that Androgen-Deprivation-Therapy is associated with increased risk for patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa) and pre-existing cardiovascular (CV) disease. Hereunder, the slightly more expensive GnRH-antagonist shows a beneficial risk profile over GnRH-agonists. Therefore the objective of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of degarelix compared to GnRH-agonists for PCa-patients with pre-existing CV disease. METHODS: This analysis is based on a pooled analysis of six Phase III-RCTs comparing GnRH-agonists with degarelix addressing CV-events in PCa-patients (Albertsen et al.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)
Code
PCN129
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders, Oncology