COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING MRI-GUIDED NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY TO TREAT ER-POSITIVE HER2-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCERS IN THE NETHERLANDS

Author(s)

Miquel-Cases A1, Steuten L2, Rigter L1, van Harten WH1
1Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2University of Washington and Panaxea bv, Seattle, WA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RG-NACT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is effective in treating oestrogen receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer patients. We estimated the expected cost-effectiveness and resource requirements of implementing RG-NACT with MRI vs. conventional-NACT for treatment of ER+/HER2- breast cancers in the Netherlands (NL). METHODS: A Markov-model was developed to analyse the incremental costs/QALY from a hospital perspective over a 5-year time horizon. Health services required (MRI scans performed, MRI technologists, breast radiologists and confirmatory scans) for and health outcomes (prevented relapses, prevented deaths, patients with adverse events or contraindications and MRI technologists with adverse events) of implementing RG-NACT were estimated via resource modelling analysis considering the current (4%) and a full implementation (100%) scenario in the Dutch population of ER+/HER2- breast cancer women (n=6306). RESULTS: RG-NACT is expected to generate 0.001 and 0.07 QALYs and save €8 and €341 costs for the 4% and 100% implementation scenarios respectively. At current implementation rate, 213 MRI examinations, 273 MRI technologists and 1 breast radiologist are required to prevent 0.4 relapses and 6 cancer deaths. At full implementation, a 25-fold increase in MRI examinations is projected, requiring ~5 times higher MRI utilization and 6560 additional MRI technologists, which is expected to prevent 10 additional relapses (+2400%) and 169 cancer deaths (+2400%). Increasing implementation rates markedly increased the number of confirmatory scans (+901), contraindications (+932) and MRI technologists experiencing adverse events (+1706) by 25-fold, and decreased the number of patients with adverse events (-29) by 1.3-fold. CONCLUSIONS: RG-NACT likely dominates conventional-NACT at current and full implementation rates. Full implementation generates a 25-fold increase in additional health benefits, but requires MRI capacity in the Netherlands to be increased 5-fold, which is challenging given a shortage of MRI technologists.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

PCN186

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×