ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER (MCRPC) PATIENTS WITHOUT PRIOR CHEMOTHERAPY

Author(s)

Traina S1, Li T1, Johnson K1, Ho KF2, Molina A3, Cella D4
1Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA, 2STAT-TU Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Janssen Research & Development, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 4Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

OBJECTIVES: PROs are used in prostate cancer clinical trials to measure therapeutic impact. We explored the temporal relationship between changes in PROs and subsequent clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. METHODS: COU-AA-302 was a multinational, double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone compared with prednisone alone in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic mCRPC patients without previous chemotherapy. Using data from the entire  COU-AA-302 patient population (N = 1088) over the first 181 days of treatment, we explored the relationships between clinical time-to-event end points and changes in PROs measuring pain, physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), and prostate cancer–specific signs and symptoms. Cox regression models were developed to assess the relationship between each PRO (separately and for all 4 simultaneously), and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) as the dependent variable, adjusting for important baseline clinical and PRO characteristics. RESULTS: In each individual model, patients with worsening PROs were at greater risk of radiographic progression compared with patients whose PRO scores improved or remained stable during the follow-up period. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for worsening pain intensity, PWB, FWB, and prostate cancer–specific symptoms were 1.68 (1.28-2.21), 2.08 (1.60-2.71), 1.35 (1.04-1.74), and 1.52 (1.18-1.95), respectively (all p ≤ 0.02). When all 4 PRO end points were included in a single multivariate model, a worsening in PWB was the most significant factor associated with worse rPFS. There were too few events at the time of analysis cutoff to explore the relationship between survival and PROs. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a significant temporal relationship between PROs and disease progression. Worsening of PROs was associated with an increased likelihood of radiographic progression. In addition to their traditional utility in describing patient-relevant outcomes in clinical trials, PROs may be valuable clinical monitoring tools when following patients for disease progression.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

CA1

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×