A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF HOSPITAL PHARMACIST REVIEW IN OLDER PATIENTS
Author(s)
Gallagher J1, O'Sullivan D1, Mc Carthy S1, Gillespie P2, Woods N1, O'Mahony D3, Byrne S1
1University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, 2National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland, 3Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
OBJECTIVES: A recent cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted in an Irish hospital evaluating a structured pharmacist review of medication (SPRM) supported by computerised decision support software (CDSS) demonstrated positive outcomes in terms of reduction of adverse drug reactions (ADR). The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of pharmacists applying a SPRM in conjunction with CDSS to older hospitalised patients compared to usual pharmaceutical care. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a cluster RCT. The trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital in the south of Ireland. The intervention arm patients (n=361) received a multi-factorial intervention consisting of medicines reconciliation, deployment of CDSS and generation of pharmaceutical care plan for patient. Control arm patients (n=376) received usual care from the hospital pharmacy team. Incremental cost-effectiveness was examined in terms of costs to the healthcare system and an outcome measure of ADRs during an inpatient hospital stay. Uncertainty in the analysis was explored using a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC). RESULTS: On average, the intervention arm was the dominant strategy in terms of cost-effectiveness. Compared to standard care (control), the intervention was associated with a decrease of €815 (95% Confidence intervals (CI) -3451, 1820) (p = 0.544) in mean healthcare cost and a decrease in the mean number of ADR events per patient of -0.064 (95% CI -0.135, 0.008) (p = 0.081). The probability of the intervention being cost-effective at respective threshold values of €0, €250, €500, €750, €1000 and €5000 was 0.721, 0.724, 0.730, 0.733, 0.737 and 0.789. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evidence presented, SPRM/CDSS is likely to be determined to be cost-effective in comparison with usual pharmaceutical care.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)
Code
PIH1
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Geriatrics, Multiple Diseases