INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE OF IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES AMONG COMMERCIALLY INSURED, MEDICARE SUPPLEMENTAL INSURED, AND MEDICAID ENROLLED POPULATIONS

Author(s)

Tomic KS1, Amato AA2, Fernandes A31Thomson Reuters, Washington, DC, USA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, 3MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

OBJECTIVES: To identify the incidence and prevalence of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) among commercially insured and Medicare and Medicaid enrolled populations in the US, using administrative claims data. IIMs are a rare group of autoimmune syndromes characterized by chronic muscle inflammation and muscle weakness with no known cause.  Little is known about their incidence and prevalence. METHODS: Medical claims with an IIM diagnosis (ICD-9-CM 710.3 [dermatomyositis (DM)], 710.4 [polymyositis (PM)], 728.81[interstitial myositis]) were retrospectively examined in the MarketScan® databases to identify age- and gender-adjusted annual IIM incidence and prevalence for 2004-2008. Sensitivity analysis was performed for evidence of a specialist visit (rheumatologist/ neurologist/dermatologist), systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressant use, or muscle biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 2990 incident patients between 2004 and 2008 (67% female, 17% Medicaid enrollees, 27% aged ≥65 years) were identified.  Overall adjusted IIM incidence for 2004-2008 for commercial and Medicare supplemental groups combined were 4.27 cases (95% CI, 4.09-4.44) and for Medicaid, 5.23 (95% CI 4.74-5.72) per 100,000 person-years (py). Disease sub-type incidence rates per 100,000-py were 1.52 (95% CI 1.42-1.63) and 1.70 (1.42-1.97) for DM, 2.46 (2.33-2.59) and 3.53 (3.13-3.94) for PM, and 0.73 (0.66-0.81) and 0.78 (0.58-0.97) for interstitial myositis for the commercial/Medicare and Medicaid cohorts respectively.  Annual incidence fluctuated over time with the base MarketScan populations.  There were 7,155 prevalent patients, with annual prevalence ranging from 20.62 to 25.32 per 100,000 for commercial/Medicare (83% of prevalent cases) and from 15.35 to 32.74 for Medicaid. Sensitivity analysis reduced the incidence rates and prevalence by 20-40%.  CONCLUSIONS: This study found higher IIM incidence and prevalence than historical small population based reports. Employer turnover, miscoding and misdiagnosing, care seeking behavior, and fluctuations in database membership over time can influence the results. Further studies are needed to confirm the incidence and prevalence of IIMs in the US population.  

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-06, ISPOR 2012, Washington, D.C., USA

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 4 (June 2012)

Code

PSY10

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×