ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TREATMENTS FOR PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION FROM THE BRAZILIAN PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Pepe C1, Olimpio A2, Meyer G3, Machado M41MedInsight, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2GlaxoSmithKline Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3Complexo Hospitalar Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Su, Brazil, 4GlaxoSmithKline, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic disease characterized by progressive elevation of pulmonary artery pressure and vascular resistance, leading to right-sided heart failure and premature death. The objective of the present research was to assess the clinical and economic aspects of current oral treatments options for PAH, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes II and III, from the Brazilian Public Health System perspective. METHODS: A literature review was conducted on the efficacy and safety of ambrisentan, bosentan and sildenafil in patients diagnosed with PAH, in order to support the assumption of clinical equivalence between the treatments and the development of a cost-minimization analysis. The clinical outcome of interest was improvement in the distance (in meters) walked in 6 minutes (6MWD).  For the economic analysis, direct medical costs were considered. Treatment, diagnostic, and procedure costs were obtained from public price/reimbursement databases. Government acquisition prices were used for all drugs. Costs associated with adverse drug reactions and treatment withdrawals were also considered. A one-year time-horizon was used and all costs were presented in 2011 Brazilian currency (1BRL=0.60USD). RESULTS: There were no studies directly comparing any of the targeted agents. Thus, an indirect comparison of placebo controlled trials of selected PAH therapies was conducted. Standardized mean differences (SMD) between agents (over placebo) was calculated and the magnitude of effects between the comparators suggested similar clinical efficacy over 12–16 weeks of treatment. Confidence intervals of treatment effects overlapped substantially and supported the clinical assumption. The total annual/monthly costs for the interventions were R$13,169.76/R$1,097.48 for ambrisentan, R$13,226.86/R$1,102.24 for sildenafil, and R$30,227.70/R$2,518.98 for bosentan. CONCLUSIONS: Ambrisentan was identified as the alternative with the lowest cost and similar clinical outcomes compared with other selected therapies for treating patients diagnosed with PAH, NYHA functional classes II and III, under the Brazilian public perspective.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-06, ISPOR 2012, Washington, D.C., USA

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 4 (June 2012)

Code

PCV47

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×