ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ETANERCEPT AS PAUSED THERAPY IN MODERATE TO SEVERE PSORIASIS FROM A PRIVATE PERSPECTIVE IN BRAZIL

Author(s)

Fernandes RA1, Takemoto MLS1, Amaral LM1, Cruz RB1, Mould JF2, Fujii RK3, Brandt H3, Almeida GR3, Manfrin DF31ANOVA - Knowledge Translation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 3Pfizer, Inc., São Paulo, SP, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Biologic treatment after systemic drugs fail in psoriasis is indicated for obtaining clinical response. Etanercept effectiveness is not lost in retreatment regimens, which allows continuous or paused therapeutic schemes. The inclusion of etanercept in the private health care system practice represents a breakthrough to psoriasis treatment in Brazil. This study aims to perform cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of biologic alternatives for moderate to severe psoriasis in Brazil, from a private payer’s perspective. METHODS: A decision-tree model simulates psoriasis evolution after treatment with etanercept paused (50mg twice a week for 12 weeks, followed by 25mg twice a week; 12-week treatment cycle and 12-week interruption), adalimumab (80mg at first week, followed by 40mg in the second week, and then 40mg every two weeks) or infliximab (5mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and then every 8 weeks) and their associated costs in a 96-week time horizon. Therapy continuation or switch was evaluated at week 24. Effectiveness measures were PASI 75 success rate and quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained. Costs included biologicals, medical follow-up and adverse events management, collected from Brazil private official databases (values represented 2010 USD). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed trough Monte Carlo simulation. A 5% discount rate was applied for costs and benefits. RESULTS: Effectiveness resulted in [PASI 75, QALY] etanercept [51.3%, 1.5360], adalimumab [50.5%, 1.5339] and infliximab [37.2%, 1.5001]. Treatment costs were 90,644USD, 110,663USD and 121,697USD, respectively. Etanercept paused represented the least costly in all comparisons: 20,019USD and 31,054USD less than adalimumab and infliximab, respectively. Acceptability curves showed etanercept paused as the most cost-effective biologic. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, etanercept presented the greatest effectiveness in paused therapeutic scheme. Due to its lower costs, etanercept showed to be cost-saving regarding PASI 75 success rate and QALY’s gained over other biologic treatments in psoriasis management at Brazil private healthcare system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-06, ISPOR 2012, Washington, D.C., USA

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 4 (June 2012)

Code

PSS11

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×