COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF VISCOSUPPLEMENTATION WITH ORTHOVISC™ (HYALURONAN) IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS, FROM THE BRAZILIAN PRIVATE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Rezende MU1, Hernandez AJ1, Namba MM2, Fernandes RA3, Takemoto MLS3, Santos PML3, Repsold DM4, Silva RC4, Andrade PC41University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 3ANOVA - Knowledge Translation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 4Johnson & Johnson Medical Brasil, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Osteoarthritis is a major cause of musculoskeletal pain and inability to work. Evidence shows that clinical improvement after viscosupplementation (VS) is able to delaying the average time until total knee arthroplasty (TKA) indication. This study aimed to conduct cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis (BIA) of viscosupplementation with Orthovisc™ (Hyaluronan) versus conservative treatment in Kellgren & Lawrence(K&L) grades II and III knee osteoarthritis (KOA) from the Brazilian private health care system perspective. METHODS: A 3-year time horizon Markov simulation model was developed to project costs and outcomes associated to KOA progression. Patients could start in ‘Orthovisc™ Treatment’ (conservative treatment + Orthovisc™) or ‘Conservative Treatment’ states and then transit (6-month cycle duration) in states ‘TKA’, ‘Post-operative’ and ‘Death’ according to transition probabilities extracted from systematic review. Only direct medical costs were considered and collected from Brazilian private official databases. Outcome was expressed as ‘avoided TKA procedure’. BIA was developed for a hypothetical private health insurance cohort of 10,000 patients over 50 years. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed for main parameters. A 5% annual discount rate was applied for costs and benefits. RESULTS: For a hypothetical 1000 patient’s cohort in a 3-year time horizon, 34TKA were performed in Orthovisc™ group versus 164TKA in conservative treatment group, avoiding 130 TKA procedures. Total costs per group were 17,367,259BRL and 17,494,500BRL for Orthovisc™ and conservative treatment groups, respectively, with an incremental cost of -127,241BRL.  Sensitivity analysis showed cost-saving results for years 2 and 3. BIA showed savings of 180,401BRL for the private health insurance and 99TKA avoided in a 3-year time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Viscosupplementation treatment, based on a Markov simulation model using Orthovisc™ data, in K&L grades II and III KOA showed to be cost-saving regarding avoided TKA in a 3-year time horizon over conservative treatment at Brazilian private health care system, leading to reduction in costs and surgical procedures.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-06, ISPOR 2012, Washington, D.C., USA

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 4 (June 2012)

Code

PMS33

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×