NAB-PACLITAXEL OR DOCETAXEL AS ALTERNATIVES TO SOLVENT-BASED PACLITAXEL IN METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC)- A COST UTILITY ANALYSIS FROM A CHINESE HEALTH CARE PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Dranitsaris G1, Yu B2, Qing Z2, King J3, Zhang A3, Kaura S3
1Augmentium Pharma Consulting, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, 3Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Paclitaxel and docetaxel are used for the treatment of MBC in China.  However, one important drawback, particularly with docetaxel, is the potential for dose-limiting toxicity.  To improve the side effect profile and efficacy of paclitaxel, an albumin-bound formulation (nab-paclitaxel) is currently available in China (Abraxane®).  Clinical trials have demonstrated that nab-paclitaxel is safer and more effective than both docetaxel and paclitaxel.  To provide economic data for China, a cost utility analysis comparing nab-paclitaxel to docetaxel, both as alternatives to paclitaxel was conducted. METHODS: Clinical data was obtained from a meta analysis of randomized trials comparing either nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m q3wk) or branded docetaxel (100 mg/m q3wk) to solvent-based branded paclitaxel (175 mg/m q3wk). Health care resource use for the delivery of chemotherapy and the management of grade 3/4 toxicity was collected from a time and motion study in three Chinese cancer centers and from a survey of clinicians.  Using the Time Trade-off technique, treatment preferences and utility estimates were obtained from interviewing 28 cancer patients from two centres in China.  All costs were reported in 2014 $U.S. RESULTS: Nab-paclitaxel had the most favourable safety profile characterized with the lowest incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia and stomatitis.  This translated into lower costs for managing the grade 3/4 side effects of nab-paclitaxel relative to both docetaxel and paclitaxel ($21 vs. $166 vs. $81). In the preference assessment, 22 of 28 (78.6%) patients selected nab-paclitaxel as their preferred agent.  As an alternative to paclitaxel, the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained was more favourable with nab-paclitaxel than docetaxel ($57,900 vs. $130,600 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Nab-paclitaxel is an economically attractive alternative to paclitaxel and docetaxel in MBC, providing a substantially lower cost per QALY. Additionally in the patient preference survey, 78.6% of patients selected nab-paclitaxel as their preferred agent.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PCN161

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×