COST-CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF AN APREPITANT REGIMEN VERSUS A STANDARD ANTIEMETIC REGIMEN FOR THE PREVENTION OF HIGHLY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN ITALY
Author(s)
Rosti G1, Ravasio R2
1ULSS 9 Treviso (Italy), Treviso, Italy, 2Health Publishing & Services, Milano, Italy
OBJECTIVES: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains an important goal for patients receiving cytotoxic treatment. The objective of this study was to assess, from the Italian National Health Service payer perspective, the costs of an antiemetic regimen using aprepitant, a selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed to compare an aprepitant regimen (aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone) with a standard antiemetic regimen (ondansetron and dexamethasone) for expected costs after highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The model was populated with clinical results from patients with high-dose cisplatin treatment in a randomized trial of CINV preventative therapy. Only direct medical costs (pharmacological treatment and emesis) – Euro 2014 – were considered. Sensitivity and Threshold analyses on key clinical and economic parameters were performed. RESULTS: Aprepitant regimen showed the lower expected treatment cost (aprepitant regimen: € 109.88; standard antiemetic regimen € 115.57). The drug acquisition cost of the aprepitant regimen (aprepitant regimen: € 86.16; standard antiemetic regimen € 79.37) was offset by reduced health care resource utilization costs for CINV (aprepitant regimen: € 23.72; standard antiemetic regimen: € 36.20). Sensitivity and Threshold analysis confirmed the base case results. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this cost-consequence analysis suggest that, from the Italian National Health Service payer perspective, aprepitant regimen is a cost-saving strategy compared with antiemetic regimen without aprepitant in the prevention of highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)
Code
PCN64
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology