COST-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT OF THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH (EHR4CR) EUROPEAN PROJECT
Author(s)
Beresniak A1, Schmidt A2, Proeve J3, Bolanos E4, Patel N5, Ammour N6, Sundgren M7, Ericson M8, De Moor G9, Kalra D10, Dupont D1
1Data Mining International, Geneva, Switzerland, 2F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland, 3Bayer Healthcare, Leverkusen, Germany, 4Eli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, Spain, 5Eli Lilly and Company (until December 2013), Windlesham, Surrey, UK, 6Sanofi-Aventis R&D, Chilly-Mazarin, France, 7AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden, 8Amgen, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, 9University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium, 10The European Institute for Health Records (EuroRec), London, UK
OBJECTIVES The EHR4CR 4-year research partnership between the European Union and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) has developed a platform for the trustworthy reuse of hospital electronic health records’ data for clinical research. A cost-benefit assessment (CBA) was conducted from the pharmaceutical industry perspective to assess the value of the first two EHR4CR clinical research scenarios (S): Protocol feasibility assessment (S1), and Patient identification and recruitment (S2), either used individually or sequentially within a clinical trial workflow, versus current practices.
METHODS The EFPIA partners have conducted a resource utilization assessment to calculate the actual person-time and cost of performing S1 and S2 for one oncology clinical study (Phase II or Phase III) as reference case. Assuming that an estimated 50% reduction in actual person-time and cost under EHR4CR conditions would directly translate in accelerated time to market (TTM), potential benefits to global pharmaceutical industry were derived using global market values (2012) of oncology products
RESULTS Compared to current practices, individual EHR4CR scenarios S1 and S2 have yielded efficiency gains of 134 days and 37 days respectively, and of 171 days when used sequentially. Should these efficiency gains from study design optimisation translate in faster TTM, corresponding estimated benefits for the global pharmaceutical oncology franchise could reach 160, 45, and 205 Million €, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS This CBA is the first to assess the value of EHR4CR scenarios for oncology clinical trials. The results confirm that the EHR4CR platform could generate substantial added value for pharmaceutical industry should its efficiency gains translate in faster TTM. Further benefits are expected from the EHR4CR platform in other therapeutic areas.
Disclosure: The EHR4CR project is mandated by the Innovative Medicines Initiative (co-funded by the European Commission and EFPIA).
- Evaluate Pharma September 2013
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)
Code
PCN93
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic