BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF BOTULINUM TOXIN A THERAPY FOR UPPER LIMB SPASTICITY IN GERMANY

Author(s)

Zoellner YF1, Gerwe M2, Richter M2
1Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany, 2Ipsen Pharma, Ettlingen, Germany

OBJECTIVES Upper limb spasticity (ULS) secondary to stroke has a considerable patient and caregiver burden, particularly with regards to pain, activities of daily living and mobility. Botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) injections are effective in treating ULS. We aimed to calculate annual BoNT-A treatment cost of ULS on a per-patient basis, and the expected overall annual budget impact of BoNT-A treatment in Germany using static and dynamic market share scenarios. METHODS A budget impact model for BoNT-A use, adopting a German healthcare system perspective, was developed. Two market-share scenarios were modelled over 5 years. While the static scenario assumed current market shares (abobotulinumtoxinA, 36%; onabotulinumtoxinA, 26%; incobotulinumtoxinA, 38%) to remain constant over time, the dynamic scenario assumed market share of abobotulinumtoxinA to rise up to 76% across 5 years. Epidemiologic data inputs were sourced from the most recently published literature, unit costs for BoNT-As from the Lauertaxe (pharmacy purchase price [PPP] level), and market share assumptions from IMS Health (Market Sizing). Equivalence of the 3 BoNTAs in terms of efficacy and safety is assumed and therefore no differential use of medical services or other goods. RESULTS Annual BoNT-A drug costs per ULS patient were 3 463€, 5 603€, and 5 410€, respectively, with prescribing patterns following SmPC recommendations for abobotulinumtoxinA, onabotulinumtoxinA, and incobotulinumtoxinA. The total drug costs were decreased by between 1 231 861€ (-4%) in year 2 and 5 133 684€ (-17%) in year 5 by shifting the market share to abobotulinumtoxinA. Sensitivity analyses showed that the number of patients treated with BoNT-As, time to re-injection, and dose per injection were the most influential parameters on budget impact, impacting both drug acquisition costs and physician visits. CONCLUSIONS Increased use of abobotulinumtoxinA compared with incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA for ULS in Germany could potentially reduce the total cost of treatment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PCV42

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×