A COMPARISON OF THE IMPACT OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES AND OTHER CHRONIC DISEASES ON EARLY RETIREMENT IN PORTUGAL
Author(s)
Laires PA1, Canhão H2, Gouveia M3
1Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia, Lisbon, Portugal, 2Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 3Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics, Lisbon, Portugal
OBJECTIVES: Chronic diseases and in particular rheumatic diseases (RD) may lead to early retirement, generating substantial indirect costs to society. We compare RD to other major chronic diseases regarding their impact on the likelihood of early retirement in the Portuguese population. METHODS: The study population consisted of all people between 50 and 64 years of age (3,762 men and 4,241 women) who participated in the Portuguese National Health Survey, conducted in 2005/2006. Self-reported data were collected on health, sociodemographic and occupational factors. The effects of RD and other chronic diseases on the likelihood of early retirement and the population attributable fractions (PAF) estimates were obtained at the individual level by logistic regression. RESULTS: At the time of the survey, 19.5% of the Portuguese population with ages between 50 and 64 years old were officially retired. A larger average number of major chronic diseases per capita was found among those with early retirement when compared to active workers in the same range of age (2.0 vs. 1.4 p<0.001). RD were particularly prevalent among early retirees when compared with employees (43.3% vs. 32.1%, p<0.001). The following OR and PAF (adjusted by age, sex and region and unadjusted) were obtained: RD (OR:1.3-1.4; PAF:7.3-9.7), chronic pain (OR:1.4-1.4; PAF:6.6-7.2), hypertension [OR:1(NS)-1.3; PAF:1.1-7.1], diabetes [OR:1(NS)-1.2(NS); PAF:0-2.4], renal impairment (OR:3.3 -3.4; PAF:2.7-3.2), respiratory diseases (OR:1.5-1.7; PAF:1.5-2.1), stroke (OR:3.2-3.6; PAF:2.6-3.2), myocardial infarction [OR:1.2(NS)-1.9; PAF:0.3-1.1], cancer (OR:2.1-1.9; PAF:2.1-2.1), depression (OR:1.5-1.2(NS); PAF:4.8-2.8) and anxiety (OR:1.6-1.5; PAF:3.7-3.5) with NS standing for not statically significant. CONCLUSIONS: From a public health angle, PAF is a good measure of the importance of a risk factor, taking into account both the strength of the association with the outcome and its prevalence in the population. Among all major chronic diseases, RD had the highest PAF estimates for early retirement in Portugal.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-11, ISPOR Europe 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)
Code
PMS60
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders