IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL DRIVERS OF COST SAVINGS WITH INSULIN ADMINISTRATION DEVICES IN TYPE 2 DIABETES IN THE UNITED STATES
Author(s)
Pollock RF1, Curtis B2, Boye KS2, Timlin L3, Valentine WJ11Ossian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 3Lilly UK, Windlesham, Surrey, United Kingdom
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To investigate potential drivers of costs and cost savings when assessing the budget impact of insulin administration devices (IADs) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A Microsoft Excel®-based model was constructed to assess the budget impact of new reusable IADs in patients with T2D. The model captured costs of insulin, IADs, needles, self-monitoring of blood glucose (test strips and glucometers) and the direct medical costs of a number of diabetes complications (minor and major hypoglycemia, myocardial infarction, stroke, end-stage renal disease, blindness and amputation). Scenarios were constructed to assess the budget impact of changes in hypoglycemia rates, compliance and insulin wastage associated with a new IAD. The analyses were performed in a one million member US healthcare plan from the payer perspective. Future costs were discounted at 3% per annum and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In a million member plan with a diabetes prevalence of 7.8% and annual diabetes incidence of 0.52%, a hypothetical IAD capable of reducing hypoglycemia rates or insulin wastage was projected to decrease healthcare expenditure over one and five-year time horizons. Conversely, a hypothetical IAD capable of improving compliance resulted in increased healthcare expenditure, driven by increased insulin and needle costs. A device that conferred all of these benefits simultaneously was found to be cost saving in the target population, resulting in a 0.62% decrease in diabetes-related healthcare expenditure over five years. CONCLUSIONS: An IAD capable of reducing hypoglycemic event rates and insulin wastage whilst improving compliance would likely be cost saving overall.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2011-05, ISPOR 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May 2011)
Code
PMD11
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Budget Impact Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders