COMPARISON OF IN VITRO FERTILIZATION TRENDS AMONG INSURED PATIENTS IN MANAGED CARE IN THE UNITED STATES; COMPARISON OF STATES WITH AND WITHOUT MANDATED COMPREHENSIVE FERTILITY COVERAGE

Author(s)

Fincher C1, Kozma C2, Hubbard J3, Meletiche DM4, Velez FF41EMD Serono, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2Independent Research Consultant/Adjunct Professor, University of South Carolina, St. Helena Island, SC, USA, 3EMD Serono, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA, 4EMD Seron

Currently 15 US states have laws that regulate insurance coverage for fertility treatments.  Differences between states with a comprehensive mandate (>2 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles) and non-comprehensive mandate (≤2 cycles) has been studied using CDC Assisted Reproductive Technology data, but less is known about the managed care perspective.  OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of state mandate on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes using a claims database. METHODS: PharMetrics® data for patients with continuous eligibility for 12 months before and after first gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist prescription (index date) between January 1, 1999 and May 31, 2009.  Patients without a prescription for follicle stimulating hormone, human chorionic gonadatropin, or evidence of an embryo transfer within 60 days of index were excluded.  Patient descriptors were: state mandate type (comprehensive versus non-comprehensive), age (<38y, >38y) and year of IVF procedure (≤2005, >2005).  ICD-9-CM code for live birth (V27.0, V27.2, V27.3, V27.5, or V27.6) was evaluated through 42 weeks post embryo transfer.  Logistic regression evaluated effects across variables.   RESULTS: A total of 880 patients met study criteria.  49.4% resided in a comprehensive mandate state.  Fewer patients in comprehensive mandate states were identified prior to 2006 (52.0%) versus non-comprehensive mandate states (58.9%) (P=0.0389).  The percentage of patients aged ≥38y was 23.0% in comprehensive versus 17.1% for non-comprehensive mandate states (P=0.0284).  There was no difference in live births between comprehensive and non-comprehensive mandate patients (49.2 and 51.5% respectively; P=0.5016).  Logistic regression results showed that patients ≤38y were more likely to have a live birth (OR 2.70; 95%CI=1.90-3.86); state mandate and year range showed no association. There were no significant interactions.  CONCLUSIONS: The live birth rate from one IVF cycle in a managed care population was ~50% and was not affected by state mandate.  Patients with completed IVF before age 38 experienced almost 3 times greater odds of live birth. 

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-05, ISPOR 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May 2011)

Code

PIH3

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Pediatrics, Reproductive and Sexual Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×