COMPARATIVE BUDGET IMPACT OF FORMULARY INCLUSION OF ZOLEDRONIC ACID AND DENOSUMAB FOR PREVENTION OF SKELETAL-RELATED EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH BONE METASTASES

Author(s)

Bell MJ1, Miller JD2, Namjoshi M3, Russell MW21RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, MA, USA, 3Novartis Oncology US, East Hanover, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Skeletal complications from bone metastases impose a significant clinical and economic burden on patients and health systems.  Zoledronic acid (ZA) has been the mainstay for prevention of skeletal related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases.  In 2010, FDA approved denosumab for prevention of SREs in patients with solid-tumor bone metastases.  We assessed the financial impact to a managed-care plan of adding denosumab to a ZA-only formulary for this indication. METHODS: We developed an Excel-based model to evaluate the trajectory of spending over 1-3 year time horizons in a hypothetical managed care plan with 1 million members and 688 patients with solid-tumor bone metastases.  The model considered use and associated costs of drug acquisition and administration, SRE management, and adverse event (AE) treatment under two scenarios: (1) Base Case—ZA-only formulary; and (2) Restricted Formulary—denosumab limited to second-line treatment in patients failing ZA.  SREs included pathologic fracture, therapeutic radiology, spinal cord compression, and orthopaedic surgery.  AEs included osteonecrosis of the jaw, renal problems, acute phase reactions, and hypocalcemia.  Model parameters were derived from published literature, product labels, clinical trial data, and administrative cost databases. Drug costs were based on published wholesale acquisition cost minus copayments. Costs were stated as 2010 US dollars. RESULTS: In the Base Case scenario (ZA only), total costs were $10.8 million per year.  Allowing restricted access to denosumab was associated with total costs of $11.4, $11.6, and $11.7 million over 1, 2, and 3 years ($0.05, $0.06, $0.08 incrementally per-member per-month).  The corresponding incremental cost of adding denosumab was $69, $94, and $115 per ZA-treated member per month. CONCLUSIONS: With an acquisition cost nearly twice that of ZA, restricted use of denosumab adds considerably to patient management costs.  Incremental benefits should be weighed carefully against these costs before considering coverage.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-05, ISPOR 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May 2011)

Code

PCN27

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×