WHEN TREATMENT IS MITIGATED BY ADVERSE EVENTS- THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TREATMENT-ASSOCIATED ADVERSE EVENTS IN CIRRHOTIC NON-RESPONDERS TREATED WITH BOCEPREVIR OR TELAPREVIR AND PEGINTERFERON ALPHA/RIBAVIRIN
Author(s)
Sullivan S*1;McDermott C1;Dieterich D2;Martel-Laferriere V2;Saab S3, Gordon S4 1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA, 3David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 4Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
OBJECTIVES: Adverse events (AEs) and premature treatment discontinuation of protease inhibitor (PI) therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) may mitigate the benefits of improved sustained virologic response. We use data from a recent study to estimate the economic impact of PI therapy in the cirrhotic non-responder population. METHODS: In the Compassionate Use of Protease Inhibitors in viral C cirrhosis (CUPIC) study, patients with compensated cirrhosis and genotype 1 CHC were treated with boceprevir (n=205) or telaprevir (n=292) in combination with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin. The investigators reported safety and tolerability in an interim 16-week analysis. Using CUPIC data and micro-costing technique, we estimate the costs of treatment-related hematologic and rash AEs by severity (Grades 2-4) and the cost of drug wastage using PI discontinuation rates due to serious AEs (SAEs) (7.3% boceprevir; 14.7% telaprevir). We surveyed 3 hepatologists to ascertain treatment patterns related to AEs and combined these estimates with cost data to compute mean costs per treatment group from the US payer perspective during the first 16 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: The AE-related costs were $1,980 and $2,161 for telaprevir and boceprevir treated patients, respectively, for the first 28 days of treatment. Medication-related costs of premature discontinuation due to SAEs were estimated at $8,463 for telaprevir and $1,575 for boceprevir. Total costs of AE and discontinuation were $10,443 and $3,736 for telaprevir and boceprevir treated groups, respectively. The results were not sensitive to variation in treatment practices and costs. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of treatment of cirrhotic non-responders during the first 16 weeks were estimated to increase by 18% over triple therapy costs due to AEs. These data indicate that the total cost per cure may be substantially higher than the drug costs and underscore the importance of evaluating total cost of HCV treatment when selecting new agents.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin
Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)
Code
PIN57
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)