EXTRAPOLATING SURVIVAL IN A HETEROGENEOUS PATIENT POPULATION WITH METASTATIC MELANOMA; A CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATING STATISTICAL AND CLINICAL CONSIDERATION

Author(s)

Majer IM*1;Gueron B2;Kotapati S3, Van Hout B4 1Pharmerit International, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2Bristol-Myers Squibb, Rueil Malmaison, France, 3Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Wallingford, CT, USA, 4Pharmerit Ltd, York, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: While the follow-up time on Ipilimumab trials is in excess of 4 years, HTA models often require survival to be extrapolated to 10 years and beyond. However, patient level data on prognostic factors are rarely available; hence extrapolation methods assume a homogeneous study population and are based on statistical considerations only. Such approaches are criticized for disregarding clinical reality and may be biased. In this study a survival extrapolation model that accounted for heterogeneity was developed based on both statistically and clinically relevant considerations. The method was applied on survival data in patients with Metastatic Melanoma. METHODS: Survival data were taken from a randomized controlled clinical trial that compared dacarbazine plus placebo versus dacarbazine plus ipilimumab. Two parametric models were explored to extrapolate survival: a model assuming no heterogeneity in patients and another model that divided patients into three subgroups based on cancer stage observed at baseline and additionally included subpopulations of a priori unobserved long-term survivors. Survival of the subpopulations was extrapolated and summed to obtain survival in the overall population. Subgroup formation was guided by expert opinion of oncologists. The statistical and clinical validity of the models were assessed. RESULTS: Among commonly used distributions (exponential, Weibull, lognormal) the lognormal distribution fitted the survival data best in the no-heterogeneity model whereas Weibull distribution was used for the heterogeneity model. For statistical validity, both models fitted the data reasonably well. However, the no-heterogeneity model underestimated the long tail of the survival curves. The no-heterogeneity model implied decreasing mortality over time while the heterogeneity model implied increasing mortality, which is more clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: The no-heterogeneity model fitted the data reasonably well but was not relevant for extrapolation from a clinical perspective. The heterogeneity model captured the long tail of the survival curve best, and provided a statistically and clinically relevant model.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PRM107

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Modeling and simulation

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×