DERIVATION OF SEVERITY INDEX FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Author(s)

Baser O*1;Baser E2;Altinbas A3, Burkan A4 1STATinMED Research/The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, MI, USA, 2STATinMED Research, Ankara, Turkey, 3Diskapi Yildirim Beyazi Education and Research Hospital, Gastroenterology Clinic, and STATinMED Research, Ankara, Turkey, 4Social Security Institution, Ankara, Turkey

OBJECTIVES: To derive a claims-based severity index for rheumatoid arthritis (SIFRA) and examine its impact on prevalent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Turkey.  METHODS: Using the Turkish national health insurance database MEDULA (01JUN2009-31DEC2011), prevalent RA patients were identified.  Patients were required to be age 18-99, have two RA diagnoses ≥60 days apart and be continuously enrolled 1 year pre- (baseline period) and post-index date (follow-up), which was the first RA claim during the identification period (01JUN2010-31DEC2010).  The SIFRA score was derived for each patient. RA-related indicators were sub-grouped as clinical and functional status, extra-articular manifestations, surgical history and medications. The strength of each relationship was measured from 0=no relationship to 6=perfect relationship, and assessed by six board-certified, clinically active rheumatologists according to the Delphi panel method. The index was previously validated and applied to the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data.  RESULTS: For the total of 1,920 identified RA patients, SIFRA scores ranged between 0 and 69.40, with a mean value of 14.21, and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.26. Mean SIFRA scores were 7.05 (49.57%), which consisted of clinical and functional status variables, followed by 6.32 (44.47%) for medications, 0.48 (3.40%) for radiology and laboratory findings, 0.32 (2.25%) for extra-articular manifestations (pulmonary nodules, subcutaneous nodules, vasculitis ever, Felty’s syndrome ever), and 0.04 (0.31%) for surgical history (cervical spine fusion, hand/foot joint replacement, foot joint/ankle/wrist fusion, total hip/knee/elbow/shoulder replacement). CONCLUSIONS: SIFRA demonstrated evidence of being a significant determinant for health care costs and biologic therapy use. This study suggests that SIFRA could be an important methodological tool to control for severity in RA-related outcomes research. Any comparative effectiveness studies in RA treatment should include severity scores in the analysis.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PRM16

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Confounding, Selection Bias Correction, Causal Inference

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×