COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INSULIN DEGLUDEC COMPARED WITH INSULIN GLARGINE FOR PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS INITIATING INSULIN THERAPY IN THE UK

Author(s)

Evans M1;Chubb B*2;Christensen T3;Gundgaard J3, Wolden M3 1University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 2Novo Nordisk Ltd, Crawley, United Kingdom, 3Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark

OBJECTIVES: Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a basal insulin with an ultra-long duration of action for management of patients with type 1 (T1DM) and patients with type 2 (T2DM) diabetes. IDeg has demonstrated effective blood glucose control with less hypoglycaemic events and an option for flexibility in dose time compared to insulin glargine (IGlar). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of IDeg versus IGlar in adults with T2DM initiating insulin therapy in the UK. METHODS: Meta-analysis data from three clinical studies were used to populate a 1-year cost-utility model. The analysis was conducted from the UK National Health Service perspective. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results. Two versions of the model were tested, one applied disutilities derived from the SF-36 questionnaire used in the clinical trials, the other applied disutilities associated with the occurrence of hypoglycaemic events. In both approaches an additional utility gain was attributed to the benefit of dosing flexibility. Baseline incidence of hypoglycaemia was derived from a UK real-life study. Resource use associated with hypoglycaemia was documented in the clinical studies. Official tariffs were used as unit costs.  RESULTS: Base-case ICERs were £15,705/QALY and £13,003/QALY in the two modelling approaches. Results were robust, with baseline rate of hypoglycaemia a key driver of results. Using hypoglycaemia rates from a subgroup of patients who experienced ≥1 hypoglycaemic event per year IDeg was highly cost-effective versus IGlar; with estimated ICERS of £4,706/QALY and £2,528/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This short-term modelling approach allows the economic evaluation of newer insulin analogues when advanced long-term modelling based on HbA1c differences is inappropriate due to treat-to-target trial design. For patients with T2DM on a basal-only insulin regimen, IDeg is cost-effective compared with IGlar and offers additional benefits to subgroups of patients, such as those suffering from recurrent hypoglycaemia.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PDB65

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×