ESTIMATING HEALTH-RELATED UTILITY FROM CLINICALLY ASSESSED DISEASE SEVERITY IN ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS

Author(s)

Poole CD1, Singh A2, Freundlich B3, Koenig A3, Currie CJ41Pharmatelligence, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 2Pfizer, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 3Pfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA, 4Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: We sought to conduct a statistical mapping analysis between a standard investigator assessment of disease severity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and domain responses in a standard index of health utility; and secondly, to implement the above mapping in an optimised algorithm to estimate utility.  METHODS: Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate response probabilities to each domain of the EQ5D from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) among patients enrolled into an RCT studying the use of either etanercept infusion vs. oral sulphasalazine (ASCEND). Other covariates tested were gender, age, co-morbidity, AS duration, DMARD history, and concurrent medications. Predicted EQ5Dindex was estimated by Monte Carlo bootstrap simulation. The predictive ability of the response mapping was assessed by comparing estimated and directly measured utility derived from the UK tariff. RESULTS: Evaluable data were available for 566 predominantly white (87%) patients, 74% of whom male, with a mean baseline age of 41 years (sd 12) and median AS duration 4 years (IQR 1 to 11).  Average BASMIlinear was 4.1 (sd 1.8) whilst median observed EQ5D utility was 0.587 (IQR 0.193 to 0.691). The linear definition of the BASMI was optimal in an algorithm that also adjusted for gender, AS duration, number of co-morbid body systems, number of historic DMARDs, number of current non-DMARD drugs, and current NSAID use. The mean utility predicted by the optimized algorithm was 0.552 (sd 0.101) and 0.559 (sd 0.295) by estimation directly from EQ5D responses (p=0.238). The mean squared error between the actual and predicted utilities was 0.076 (sd 0.111).  Adjusted utility was defined by -0.044*BASMIlinear+0.715, with an R2 of 0.62.  CONCLUSIONS: In this study, response mapping of AS disease activity to the EQ5Dindex produced reliable estimates of preference-based health-related utility. Future analysis will compare the relative ability of patient-reported, AS-specific, functional assessment measures in predicting health-related utility.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-05, ISPOR 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 2010)

Code

PMS2

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×