EFFECT OF EQUIVALENT AND NON-EQUIVALENT SUBSTITUTION OF PRESCRIBED DRUGS FOR DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY DISORDERS ON PATIENTS' TREATMENT ADHERENCE AND PERCEPTION
Author(s)
LaPensee K1, Carson R1, Werner P1, Sexton CC2, Gelhorn H2, Stankus A3, Erder H11Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, NJ, USA, 2United BioSource Corporation, Bethesda, MD, USA, 3Kantar Health, Princeton, NJ, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of “equivalent substitution” (true generic of the prescribed drug) or “non-equivalent substitution” (switch to another agent, brand or generic) on perceptions, attitudes, and treatment adherence in patients with and without depression and anxiety disorder. METHODS: Over 10,000 randomly-selected US respondents from the 2007 National Health and Wellness Survey (NWHS) completed a self-administered, internet-based survey. The subpopulation of 2360 self-identified anxious/depressed respondents was supplemented with 5539 re-contacted self-identified anxious/depressed responders from the 2006/2007 NWHS. Responses from non-anxious/depressed patients were compared to those of self-identified anxious/depressed patients using t-tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear and logistic regressions. Comparisons were also made between anxious/depressed subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 52% of non-anxious/depressed patients experienced therapeutic substitution; 50% reported equivalent and 18% to non-equivalent substitutions (different brand - 10%, generic of another agent - 8%). 51% of the non-anxious/depressed and 71.5% of the anxious/depressed patients have experienced switching. More anxious/depressed patients found required step therapy unacceptable (P <0.001; many tried to change health plans for this reason.77% of non-anxious/depressed and 81% of anxious/depressed patients considered equivalent substitution (an equivalent generic) acceptable, but only about half in both groups thought that non-equivalent substitution was acceptable. Substitution affected attitudes and treatment adherence significantly more in anxious/depressed vs. non-anxious/depressed patients. Importantly, anxious/depressed patients subjected to non-equivalent substitution reported significantly lower treatment adherence than those who were not (P <0.001). Switching to a non-equivalent generic also reduced adherence more than switching to an equivalent generic (P<0.0001) in this population. CONCLUSIONS: About half of all respondents found required step therapy unacceptable. Anxious/depressed patients reported significant deterioration of treatment adherence and treatment-related attitudes following equivalent, and especially non-equivalent substitution. Substitution of prescribed drugs for depression or anxiety disorders negatively affected self-reported treatment adherence in the treated population, which may impact treatment outcomes.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2010-05, ISPOR 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 2010)
Code
PMH75
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Mental Health