ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT FORMS OF BETAHISTINE IN PATIENTS WITH VERTIGO

Author(s)

Vorobyev PA1, Lesnicheva MV2, Morozova SV3, Suleymanov SS4, Sarvilina IV2, Kupayev VI21Russian Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Moscow, Russia, 2Russian Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Moscow, Moscow, Russia, 3I.M. Sechenov Moscow Medical Academy, Moscow, Moscow, Russia, 4Russian Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Khabarovsk, Khabarovsk, Russia

OBJECTIVES: to perform economic evaluation of three forms of betahistine in patients with vertigo. METHODS: an open-labeled prospective multicenter randomized study was performed in 14 out-patient clinics of Russia. The duration of a study was 30 days. Patients with vertigo were treated with three forms of betahistine (Betaserc, Betaver, Vestibo) in combination with any other medications to the discretion of investigator. The effectiveness criteria were proportion of patients with absence of moderate and severe functional disorders (according to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) and increase of patients’ quality of life rate compared to the initial one (according to EQ-5D questionnaire).  Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Betaver group included 70 (33.2%) patients, Betaserc group – 71 (33.6%) patients, and Vestibo group – 70 (33.2%) patients with moderate vertigo. All patients initially had moderate and severe functional disorders. The proportion of patients without absence of moderate and severe functional disorders up to the end of a study was 54% in Betaver group, 57% in Vestibo group and 69% in Betaserc group. The average difference between initial quality of life rate and the quality of life after the treatment was 19.53, 19.62 and 22.79 (Betaver, Vestibo and Betaserc groups accordingly). Cost of treatment was nearly similar in all groups. The cost-effectiveness ratio according to the criteria “the proportion of patients with absence of moderate and severe functional disorders” was minimal in Betaserc group (8,088.57) compared to Betaver (10,358.17) and Vestibo (8,955.49) groups. The cost-utility ratio according to the criteria “the increase of patients’ quality of life rate compared to the initial one” was also minimal in Betaserc group (244.89) compared to Betaver (286.4) and Vestibo (260.17) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Betaserc seems to be more clinically and economically effective betahistine compared to another two medications in treatment of patients with vertigo.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-05, ISPOR 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 2010)

Code

PND15

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Neurological Disorders, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×