DIABETES RISK ASSESSMENT - APPLICATION AND VALIDATION OF A DIABETES SCREENING SCORE APPLIED TO THE NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS SURVEY
Author(s)
Langley PC1, Bang H2, Annunziata K3, Gross H31University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2Cornell University, New York, NY, USA, 3KantarHealth, Princeton, NJ, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To apply a risk assessment algorithm to a national US population sample (i) to determine the prevalence of at-risk pre-diabetic and undiagnosed diabetic participants and (ii) to validate the role of the risk factors included in the scoring algorithm in the prediction of diagnosed type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Data from the 2009 US National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) were used to apply a modified version of a recently developed scoring algorithm/prediction model to identify patients at-risk for screening for pre-diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes. The algorithm combines six risk factors to generate total risk scores: age, gender, family history of hypertension, high blood pressure, obesity, and physical activity. Estimates of the national prevalence of those at risk together with key health status attributes were generated. RESULTS: Among those 18 years of age and over in the NHWS sample (N=74,474) without a confirmed diagnosis of diabetes, 27.3% of participants were estimated to be at elevated risk for diabetes and a further 16.5% for pre-diabetes. Among those with a confirmed diagnosis of diabetes (excluding persons with type 1 diabetes), 73.6% were confirmed by the scoring algorithm with a further 13.8% meeting pre-diabetic criteria. Overall, 10.0% had a confirmed type 2 diabetes diagnosis. The fitted prediction model indicated the following variables were strongest risk factors in the NHWS sample: i) age 60 years and over (odds ratio 6.94); ii) morbid obesity (odds ratio 6.11); iii) a family history of diabetes (odds ratio 4.79); and (iv) being obese (odds ratio 3.04). All variables significant at the 1% level. The sensitivity was 23.2%, specificity 97.8%, positive predictive value 57.3% and negative predictive value 91.0%, with area under the ROC curve of 0.847. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides strong support for the new scoring algorithm to identify both pre-diabetic and diabetic at-risk populations.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2010-05, ISPOR 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 2010)
Code
PDB9
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders