Author(s)
Kim K1, Hernlund E1, Justo N1, Hernadi Z2, Pete I3, Révész J4, Szánthó A5, Bodnar L6, Madry R7, Timorek-Lemieszczuk A8, Bozanovic T9, Vasovic S10, Tomasevic Z10, Zivaljevic M11, Pazin V12, Minárik T13, Garanová H14, Heľpianska L151OptumInsight, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Medical University of Debrecen, Clinic of Gynaecology, Debrecen, Hungary, 3National Oncological Institute, Budapest, Hungary, 4Department of Gynecology in County Hospital of BAZ, Miskolc , Hungary, 5Semmelweis University Budapest, Clinic of Gynecology, Budapest, Hungary, 6Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland, 7Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland, 8Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland, 9Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro, 10Institute for oncology and radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro, 11Institute for Oncology of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia and Montenegro, 12Gynecology and Obstetrics “Narodni Front”, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro, 13Národný onkologicky ústav, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, 14Východoslovenský onkologický ústav, Košice, Slovak Republic, 15Onkologický ústav sv. Alžbety, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
OBJECTIVES: Despite the considerable disease burden of ovarian cancer (OC), there were no cost studies in Central and Eastern Europe. This study aimed to describe treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with OC in Hungary, Poland, Serbia and Slovakia. METHODS: Overall clinical practice for management of epithelial ovarian cancer was investigated through a three-round Delphi panel consisting of 15 clinical experts. Experts completed a survey based on patient records (N=1,542). The survey was developed based on clinical guidelines and the FIGO Annual Report. Means, ranges and outlier values were discussed with the experts during a telephone interview. Finally, consensus estimates were obtained in face-to-face workshops. Based on these results, overall cost of OC was estimated using a Markov model. RESULTS: The patients included in the chart review were followed from pre-surgical diagnosis and in each phase of treatment, i.e. primary surgical staging and surgery, chemotherapy and chemotherapy monitoring, follow-up and palliative care. Overall treatment patterns were similar but regimens in second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy varied across the countries. The 5-year overall cost per patient was €13,900-€17,200 in Hungary, €16,300-€18,300 in Poland, €8,900-€9,600 in Serbia and €12,500-€15,700 in Slovakia (presented in ranges due to uncertainty around palliative care). Chemotherapy-associated costs accounted for 59-71% of the total, followed by primary surgical treatment (13-23%) and palliative care (4-15%). Contribution of drug costs to the overall costs varied among the countries (in Poland 29%, in Serbia 55% of total costs). CONCLUSIONS: Given the scarcity of OC cost studies worldwide, these findings may provide a useful source for clinicians and decision makers in understanding the economic implications of managing ovarian cancer in Central and Eastern Europe and the need for innovative therapies.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2012-11, ISPOR Europe 2012, Berlin, Germany
Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 7 (November 2012)
Code
PCN50
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Oncology