COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF BECLOMETHASONE/FORMOTEROL VERSUS FLUTICASONE/SALMETEROL IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENT WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ASTHMA IN SPAIN

Author(s)

Collados C1, Ojeda P2, Martín V3, Rejas J41Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe (Madrid), Spain, 2Clínica de Asma y Alergia Dres. Ojeda, Madrid, Spain, 3Trial Form Support, S.L.,, Alcobendas, Spain, 4Pfizer España, Alcobendas/Madrid, Spain

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of Beclomethasone/Formoterol (BF) versus Fluticasone/Salmeterol (FS) in the treatment of adult out-patients with moderate to severe asthma from the perspective of the Society in Spain.  METHODS: A Markov model was developed with five asthma health states: successful control, sub-optimal control, outpatient-managed exacerbation, inpatient-managed exacerbation, and death. Weekly transition probabilities were derived from the published 12-weeks ICAT SE study. Resources utilization were obtained from a published Spanish study designed ad-hoc to ascertain healthcare resources utilization, the so-called lost-workday-equivalents, and corresponding costs related with treatment of asthma in the year 2011. Time horizon was set at 12 weeks in the basecase scenario. Effectiveness was expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gain. The cost-effectiveness was expressed as an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). Bootstrapping techniques (10,000 re-samples) were used to obtain the probabilistic ICER, its 95% percentile confidence interval (CI) and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were also applied and included, among others, extension of the horizon to one year and the perspective of the NHS only.  RESULTS: Compared with FS, BF was associated with a slightly increase in QALY gain; 0,7974 vs. 0,7945 while differential costs were always lower favoring BF and yielding to a mean ICER dominant (95% CI: dominant; €46,930) per QALY gained. In 96% of re-samples, the ICER was below the threshold of €30,000 per QALY, considered as cost-effective in Spain. Univariate and PSA were robust and confirmed results of the basecase scenario. CONCLUSIONS: From the Spanish societal and NHS perspectives in year 2011, Becomethasone/Formoterol produced similar QALY gain at a lower cost when compared with Fluticasone/Salmeterol in a highly meaningful number of replications and scenarios. Thus, Beclomethasone/Formoterol may be considered a cost-effective alternative in the treatment of moderate to severe asthma in Spain.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-11, ISPOR Europe 2012, Berlin, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 7 (November 2012)

Code

PRS22

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×