COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF TOCILIZUMAB AND ATNF BIOLOGIC MONOTHERAPIES ON PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) IN RA PATIENTS WHO HAVE SHOWN AN INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO CONVENTIONAL DMARDS (DMARD-IR)- A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Buckley F1, Ogale S2, Dejonckheere F3, Jansen JP11MAPI Consultancy, Boston, MA, USA, 2Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA, 3F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: Head to head data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing biologic monotherapies is limited. Our objective was to compare PROs for tocilizumab monotherapy vs. other approved biologic monotherapies, in DMARD-IR RA patients, based on currently available RCT evidence. METHODS: Full-text publications of RCTs that assessed tocilizumab, and other biologic therapies, as monotherapy in DMARD-IR patients were identified through a systematic literature review. RCTs reporting data on PROs (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), pain VAS, patient global assessment of disease activity  (PGA) VAS, SF-36, or fatigue) at 24 weeks were included. Where sufficient data was available, Bayesian network meta-analyses was used to obtain treatment effect estimates between included interventions. It was assumed that the effects of the aTNF treatments were exchangeable, and data for the assessed aTNFs were pooled to give a single, more stable estimate. RESULTS: Four studies were identified that formed a network comparing monotherapy treatments (tocilizumab and aTNFs (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab pegol)) and reported PRO data. Data on pain VAS, PGA VAS, and HAQ-DI was most commonly reported. Tocilizumab monotherapy showed greater improvement in pain [Difference -11.38 (95% CrI -18.40, -4.32)] and PGA [Difference -10.49 (95% CrI -17.68, -3.24)] compared to the assessed aTNF monotherapies. Tocilizumab monotherapy showed greater improvement in HAQ-DI [Difference -0.52 (95% CrI -0.73, -0.31)] compared with placebo, and was at least as efficacious compared to aTNF monotherapy [Difference -0.16 (95% CrI -0.33, 0.01)]. Insufficient data was reported for the SF-36 and fatigue to allow network meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on network meta-analysis of currently available RCT evidence, involving indirect comparison of trial findings, tocilizumab monotherapy was found to have better outcomes than assessed aTNF monotherapies in terms of patient reported pain and disease activity in a DMARD-IR RA population. Tocilizumab was at least as efficacious as aTNF agents in improvement in physical function.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-11, ISPOR Europe 2012, Berlin, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 7 (November 2012)

Code

PMS64

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×