CAN A POPULATION-BASED PATIENT REGISTRY IMPROVE THE FEASIBILITY OF OUTCOMES RESEARCH IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA?

Author(s)

Blommestein H1, Franken M2, Verelst S3, Gaultney JG4, Huijgens P5, Sonneveld P6, Redekop WK4, Uyl-de Groot C71Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 2Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 4Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 5VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 6Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 7Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Zuid Holland, Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: Dutch policy requires evidence from outcomes research for the assessment of appropriate drug use and real-world cost-effectiveness. We investigated whether a population-based patient registry could improve the feasibility of outcomes research in multiple myeloma compared to a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Two methods were used to investigate the feasibility of outcomes research. First, we conducted outcomes research for bortezomib in multiple myeloma (n=139) by retrospectively collecting detailed data from hospital medical records in 38% of all Dutch hospitals. Second, we conducted outcomes research by using a population-based registry for haematological malignancies (PHAROS) covering 40% of the Netherlands. Up till now, the registry contains 3093 patients, including 802 patients with multiple myeloma. RESULTS: In the retrospective bortezomib study, it was possible to gather data on drug and resource use in everyday practice. However, due to great patient heterogeneity, extensive treatment variation (>10 drugs in >20 combinations) and missing prognostic information (e.g. 71% missing serum β2-microglobulin levels), it was impossible to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness of bortezomib. The PHAROS population-based registry also provided data on drug and resource use in everyday practice. Like the retrospective study, the registry revealed extensive treatment variation. This, in combination with great patient heterogeneity, challenged the feasibility to identify appropriate groups of comparable patients to calculate cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a clinical trial, outcomes research in multiple myeloma is complicated by extensive treatment variation and wide patient heterogeneity. The PHAROS registry provides better generalisable outcomes research results, but many challenges remain in data analysis. Nevertheless, the greater number of real-world patients might provide the opportunity to obtain a sufficiently valid cost-effectiveness estimate by using comprehensive modeling techniques and different data sources.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-11, ISPOR Europe 2012, Berlin, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 7 (November 2012)

Code

PCN126

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Coverage with Evidence Development & Adaptive Pathways

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×