COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FIRST-LINE COMBINATION TREATMENT WITH BEVACIZUMAB PLUS FOLFIRI VERSUS FOLFIRI IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER- A UK PERSPECTIVE
Author(s)
Marlene Gyldmark, MSc, MPhil, Head of Modeling1, Rick Aultman, MSc, Statistician1, Uwe Siebert, MD, MPH, MSc, ScD, Prof. Dr2, Eduardo Sabate, MD, MBA, MPH, International Economic Strategy Leader31F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; 2 UMIT – University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T, Austria; 3 F. Hoffmann–La Roche Pharmaceuticals, AG, Basel, Switzerland
OBJECTIVES To determine incremental costs and life expectancy of adding bevacizumab (bev) to an irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) regimen (FOLFIRI) for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) in the UK. METHODS We performed a decision analysis with a THREE-health-state area under the curve model to explore the effects of adding bev treatment to an existing FOLFIRI-based regimen. The model structure was based on a published model by National Institute of Technology Excellence (NICE), UK. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data were derived from clinical trials comparing bev+irinotecan and 5-FU/LV (IFL) with IFL alone. The impact on OS for bev+FOLFIRI was included through an indirect comparison of hazard ratios (HRs) between bev+mIFL versus bev+FOLFIRI (HR for death: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.12-2.88). Treatment effect for bev+FOLFIRI was maintained during the 40-month clinical follow-up. The FOLFIRI PFS was created by applying the HR from IFL versus FOLFIRI (HR for progression or death: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.16-1.97) to the IFL PFS. Outcomes included life years, QALYs, direct costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A life-time horizon (8 years) was used. Cost and outcomes were discounted by 3.5% per annum. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS The estimated discounted life expectancy for bev+FOLFIRI-treated patients was 2.62 years (undiscounted: 2.77 years) versus 1.58 years (undiscounted: 1.63 years) in the FOLFIRI arm. The discounted costs in the 2 arms were £49,798 and £23,698, respectively. The discounted ICER was £25,045 per life-year gained and £40,532 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis on key variables showed that assumptions of size (HR) and duration of treatment effect were the most influential factors for the ICER. CONCLUSIONS Bev+FOLFIRI versus current FOLFIRI-based treatment regimens for MCRC increases survival for these patients and is a cost effective treatment option.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2009-05, ISPOR 2009, Orlando, FL, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 3 (May 2009)
Code
PCN69
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology