ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCE AND SATISFACTION WITH A WEEKLY ORAL TABLET VERSUS A 6-MONTH SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS

Author(s)

D Macarios, BSc, MBA, Health Economic Director1, D-L Kendler, MD, Director2, D-T Gold, PhD, Associate Professor of Medical Sociology3, R Horne, BSc, MSc, PhD, M, Director and Professor4, Jeff Borenstein, MD, MPH, Clinical Research Medical Dir1, S-F Varon, PhD, Title1, H-S Man, MS, Sr Associate Biostatistics1, S Siddhanti, PhD, Development Clinical Director1, S Satram-Hoang, PhD, Health Economist1, H-G Bone, MD, Endocrinologist51Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; 2 Clinical Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 3 Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Durham, NC, USA; 4 The School of Pharmacy, University of London, London, United Kingdom; 5 Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA

OBJECTIVES We compared patient preference and satisfaction between two osteoporosis medications: alendronate (ALN 70mg tablets) taken orally once weekly (QW) and denosumab (DMAb 60mg; investigational agent) injected subcutaneously (SC) every 6 months (Q6M). METHODS Preference and satisfaction were evaluated as part of a phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy study to determine the effects of transitioning subjects from ALN to DMAb. Postmenopausal women ≥55 with a lumbar spine or total hip T-score ≤-2.0 and ≥-4.0 who were receiving ALN therapy for ≥6 months were eligible. After a 1-month ALN run-in phase, subjects were randomized to treatment with continued ALN QW + placebo injection SC Q6M or DMAb SC Q6M + QW placebo tablet. At study conclusion, subjects completed a 34-item questionnaire. Pre-determined endpoints of preference and satisfaction were measured by asking subjects to choose the tablet, the injection, or neither, in response to questions on preference ("Which do you prefer?") and satisfaction ("With which frequency of administration have you been more satisfied?"). RESULTS The subjects (n=251 ALN, n=253 DMAb) had a mean age of 67.6 years and a median length of prior bisphosphonate use of 36 months (range 6 to 192). 483 (95.8%) women took the questionnaire (240-ALN, 243-DMAb). Of the subjects who responded to the question on preference (240-ALN, 240-DMAb) or satisfaction (237-ALN, 242-DMAb), significantly more subjects preferred a 6-month injection vs a weekly oral tablet (ALN:66%-Q6M injection, 19%-QW tablet, 15%-neither, p<0.0001; DMAb:70%-Q6M injection, 19%-QW tablet, 12%-neither, p<0.0001) and significantly more subjects reported greater satisfaction with the frequency of 6-month vs weekly dosing (ALN:68%-Q6M injection, 19%-QW tablet, 14%-neither, p<0.0001; DMAb:70%-Q6M injection, 16%-QW tablet, 14%-neither, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS A preference for and a greater satisfaction with a 6-month injection vs a weekly oral tablet was demonstrated in subjects previously receiving and tolerating ALN therapy.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2009-05, ISPOR 2009, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 3 (May 2009)

Code

MS1

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×