ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ETANERCEPT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS FROM THE PUBLIC PAYER PERSPECTIVE IN BRAZIL

Author(s)

Fernandes RA1, Takemoto MLS1, Tolentino ACM1, Takemoto MMS1, Santos PML1, Mould JF21ANOVA - Knowledge Translation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) leads to significant impact on management costs and patient’s quality of life. In Brazil, costs associated to RA patient’s care are 6.6-fold higher than general population, with greater resources consumption. Biologic treatment after two disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs fail is an alternative, but their high cost represents a challenge for decision makers. Currently, adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab are provided by the Brazilian public healthcare system. This study aims to assess the cost per responder of etanercept versus adalimumab and infliximab, for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis treatment from a public payer perspective in Brazil. METHODS: A decision-tree model was developed to simulate RA evolution after treatment with etanercept (basecase treatment), adalimumab or infliximab as first-line therapies and their associated costs over a 12-month time horizon. Therapy continuation or switch was evaluated at week 24. Effectiveness measure was ACR70 response. Direct medical costs included biologics, concomitant drugs, medical follow-up and adverse events management. Clinical response was extracted from published literature, while costs were collected from Brazilian public official databases. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed through Monte Carlo Simulation second-order approach. RESULTS: In basecase analysis, 31.4%, 18.2% and 12.9% patients met ACR70 response for etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab. Annual costs per ACR70 responder were 147,147USD, 264,097USD and 327,632USD, respectively. Etanercept represented the least costly per ACR70 responder and the most effective alternative in all comparisons: 116,950USD and 180,485USD less than adalimumab and infliximab, respectively; 13.2% and 18.5% more patients met ACR70 response regarding adalimumab and infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept exhibited incremental clinical effectiveness at a lower cost per ACR70 responders when compared to adalimumab and infliximab, from the Brazilian public health care system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)

Code

PMS40

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×