COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATING METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (MRCC) PATIENTS WHOSE DISEASE FAILED ON ONE PRIOR VEGF-TKI THERAPY WITH EVEROLIMUS COMPARED TO TREATING WITH BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE (BSC) ALONE IN CANADA
Author(s)
Casciano R1, Chulikavit M1, El Ouagari K2, Wang X31Analytica International Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Dorval, QC, Canada, 3Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Florham Park, NJ, USA
OBJECTIVES: The analysis of the sub-group of patients who received one prior VEGF-TKI-based therapy in the RECORD-1 clinical trial reported a median progression-free survival of 5.42 months and 1.87 months for the everolimus and BSC-alone arms, respectively. A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of treating mRCC patients whose disease had failed on one prior VEGF-TKI therapy with everolimus versus BSC alone from the Canadian societal perspective. METHODS: A Markov model simulated 2 hypothetical patient cohorts (everolimus versus BSC alone) from the time of initial treatment throughout the 6-year time horizon. The cost-effectiveness of everolimus was calculated in terms of cost per life-years gained (LYG) as well as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Health state transition probabilities were derived directly from the RECORD-1 subgroup analysis; costs and health state utility values were obtained from literature. The analysis was performed from a societal perspective; as such, direct medical costs and indirect costs associated with productivity loss due to morbidity or future income loss attributed to early mortality were included. A sensitivity analysis from the payer’s perspective was additionally performed. Outcomes and costs were discounted at a 5% annual rate. RESULTS: Treatment with everolimus produced an estimated gain over BSC alone of 0.643 LYG (0.455 QALYs) at an incremental cost of $22,074. The deterministic analysis resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $34,326/LYG and $48,507/QALY. The payer’s perspective sensitivity analysis resulted in ICERs of $48,670/LYG and $68,777/QALY. According to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, given a threshold of $100,000/QALY, the probability that everolimus was cost-effective, from a societal perspective, was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this analysis suggest that, from a Canadian societal perspective, everolimus is a cost-effective alternative to BSC alone when treating mRCC patients whose disease fails on one prior VEGF-TKI treatment.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)
Code
PCN65
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology