CLINICAL TRIAL LEARNING CURVES MAY IMPACT BOTH CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC OUTCOMES, AND INFLUENCE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT DECISION MAKING

Author(s)

Spinner DS1, Mladsi DM1, Walter JW1, Stafford-Smith M2, Taekman JM2, Faulkner EC11RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

OBJECTIVES: We previously presented evidence suggesting that clinical trial learning curves may affect clinical outcomes in patients in drug trials. In the current analysis, we demonstrate the potential effect of learning curves on economic outcomes (specifically, cost-effectiveness). METHODS: The PROWESS trial, which evaluated drotrecogin alpha (DrotAA) for severe sepsis, was identified in our previous study and was chosen for further analysis based on several considerations: a published analysis suggested that a clinical trial learning curve may have had a substantial effect on outcomes in a subgroup of patients (APACHE II < 25); and a published cost-effectiveness analysis (which did not account for the learning curve effect) was transparent and easily replicable. Furthermore, a health technology appraisal (HTA) of DrotAA conducted in the UK cited the cost-effectiveness analyses, which suggested that the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for patients with APACHE II scores < 25 was > US$400,000. Similarly, an Australian reimbursement decision excluded this patient subpopulation from coverage citing unacceptable cost-effectiveness. We replicated the cost-effectiveness analysis for DrotAA, and used it to model the cost-effectiveness of DrotAA in the subgroup of patients with APACHE II < 25, both with and without the patients enrolled earlier in the trial and thus potentially affected by the learning curve. RESULTS: When patients who may have been affected by the trial learning curve were excluded from the analysis, cost-effectiveness of DrotAA improved significantly, from US$411,333 per LYG with all patients with APACHE II score < 25 to US$46,395 per LYG when the first block of patients enrolled at each site was removed from the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trial learning curves potentially affect both clinical and economic outcomes, and impact reimbursement decisions. Consideration of learning curves may be important in HTAs and reimbursement decisions, particularly when evaluating trial data in which learning curves are more likely to be present. 

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)

Code

PHP125

Topic

Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×