ABATACEPT OR INFLIXIMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO METHOTREXATE- A TRIAL-BASED AND REAL-LIFE COST-CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Benucci M1, Stam W2, Gilloteau I3, Crocchiolo D4, Sennfält K3, Leclerc A3, Bengtsson N5, Maetzel A6, Lucioni C71Ospedale S. Giovanni di Dio ASL 10, Firenze, Italy, 2Stam Consulting, Houten, Netherlands, 3Bristol-Myers Squibb, Rueil Malmaison, France, 4Bri

OBJECTIVES: In the 1-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled ATTEST trial, efficacy of abatacept or infliximab vs. placebo was reported in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to methotrexate. We estimated trial-based and real life costs of abatacept and infliximab for achieving pre-defined remission or low disease activity state (LDAS) as recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). METHODS: Quantity of drug, serious adverse event (SAE) rates and time (months) in remission or LDAS were taken from ATTEST for the trial-based calculation to derive a cost per remitting/LDAS patient and cost per patient-month in remission/LDAS. We used list prices for drugs and public tariffs for infusion and hospitalization due to SAEs. Trial-based analyses were made for the full year, and the first and subsequent 6 months (initiation & maintenance).  Maintenance costs were extrapolated to real life, taking into account dose escalation and shortening of infusion intervals with infliximab. SAE rates from a Cochrane network meta-analysis were considered in the real-life analyses. All analyses were conducted from a health care system perspective for Italy. RESULTS: In Italy, the annual trial-based costs per remitting/LDAS patient were €70,259/€37,219 for abatacept vs. €85,547/€46,592 for infliximab. In the initiation phase, costs per patient-month in remission/LDAS were €11,028/€6,020 for abatacept vs. €8,347/€4,173 for infliximab. Abatacept showed lower costs per patient-month in remission/LDAS in the maintenance phase €5,046/€2,673 vs. €5,500/€2,996 for infliximab. Real-life maintenance costs per month in remission/LDAS were: €5,347/€2,832 for abatacept vs. €7,210/€3,927 for infliximab. Higher initiation cost for abatacept to achieve remission/LDAS would be offset at 14.6/16.1 months during real life. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a lower cost-consequence for abatacept during the maintenance phase and its real-life extrapolation. Abatacept is a sustainable, safe, and economically attractive biologic for the long-term treatment of RA when compared to infliximab.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)

Code

PMS29

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×