PREDICTING RISK OF WORK LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH PREMENSTRUAL SYNDROME (PMS) AND PREMENSTRUAL DYSPHORIC DISORDER (PMDD) USING PHYSICAL COMPONENT SUMMARY (PCS) SCORE

Author(s)

Joseph A Gricar, MS, HealthCare Consultant1, Min Yang, MD, PhD, Senior Scientist2, Joanne Chang, MD, PhD, Head of US Health Economics, Outcomes & Reimbursement31Independent HealthCare Consultant, New York, NY, USA; 2 QualityMetric Health Outcomes Solutions, Lincoln, RI, USA; 3 Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Wayne, NJ, USA

Objective: Clinically significant PMS and its more severe form, PMDD, can impact women's physical health and interfere with their ability to work. This study used the Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores to predict work loss risk associated with the two diagnoses. Methods: Two data sources were used. From the Medical Outcome Study (MOS), PCS scores from SF-36 Health Survey was regressed onto three work loss outcomes (inability-to-work-due-to-health-problems at baseline, work loss follow-ups at 6-months and one-year) with age and gender as covariates. In an Internet survey, the SF-12 Health Survey and retrospective component of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) for identifying “at-risk-for-clinically-significant-PMS” and retrospective criteria in DSM-IV-TR for identifying “at-risk-for-PMDD” were collected from a panel of representative U.S. women 18-45 years (N=971). Given PCS scores from SF-12 in the Survey, regression coefficients derived from MOS logistic regressions were used to generate odds ratios (OR) of work loss risk for women with and without PMS or PMDD. ANOVA tests compared the probability differences in ORs within each diagnosis. Results: A total of 17.7% and 6.0% of women were identified as “at-risk-for-clinically-significant-PMS” and “at-risk-for-PMDD”, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in all outcome comparisons in both diagnoses (p<0.001). Women not at risk for either diagnosis had risks of work loss comparable to the general population. Women “at-risk-for-clinically-significant-PMS” had a 139% increased risk of work loss with the concurrent state; those who worked at baseline had 32% increased risk of work loss at both follow-ups. Women “at-risk-for-PMDD” had a 181% increased risk of work loss at the concurrent state; those who worked at baseline had 46% increased risk of work loss at both follow-ups. Conclusion: Using PCS scores, women with either clinically significant PMS or PMDD were more likely to experience work loss than the general population, especially women with PMDD.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-05, ISPOR 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 3 (May/June 2008)

Code

PIH19

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Disease

Reproductive and Sexual Health

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×