EFFICACY OF BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIASIS; META-ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Valentin Brodszky, MD, Assistant Lecturer1, Marta Pentek, MD, Senior Consultant Rheumatologist2, Krisztian Karpati, economic, PhD student1, Imre Boncz, MD, MSc, PhD, associate Professor3, Andor Sebestyén, MD, MBA, Deputy Director4, Laszlo Gulacsi, PhD, Professor11Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary; 2 Flor Ferenc County Hospital, Kistarcsa, Hungary; 3 University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; 4 National Health Insurance Fund Administration, Budapest, Hungary

Objective: Five biological treatments are registered for psoriasis, the tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitor adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab and the T-cell modulator alefacept, efalizumab. Our objectives were to analyse the efficacy of registered biological drugs in psoriasis and also to compare their efficacy on a pharmacological group level. Methods: Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy was used to identify RCTs in MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria were: a) treatment of psoriasis b) outcome data on the proportions of patients achieving at least 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline. The quality of selected studies was measured using the Jadad-score. Data were entered into Review Manager 4.2 software. The chosen summary statistic variable was the number needed to treat (NNT). Due to lack of face-to-face evidence on biologics, an indirect comparison of the trials was conducted, applying the method proposed by Butcher. Results: Sixteen RCTs involving 7339 patients were identified. The active treatment was adalimumab in 1 trial (n=147), alefacept in three trials (n=1289), efalizumab in four trials (n=2444), etanercept in four trials (n=1964) and infliximab in four trials (n=1495). All trials were placebo controlled and the primary follow-up time was 12 weeks. The primary outcome was PASI75 criteria in all trials. To achieve PASI75, the number of patients needed to treat (95% confidence intervals) with adalimumab 40 mg/eow, alefacept 15 mg, efalizumab 1 mg/kg, etanercept 2 x 50 mg/week and infliximab 5 mg/kg were 2.04 (1.54-2.94), 5.00 (3.57-7.69), 3.85 (3.13-5.26), 2.27 (2.08-2.50) and 1.32 (1.25-1.39), respectively. Indirect comparisons of TNF-alpha inhibitors and T-cell modulators yielded the odds ratios of 5.54 (3.65-8.42). Conclusion: All biologicals were superior to placebo, alefacept with the highest and infliximab with the lowest NNT. TNF-alpha inhibitors were significantly superior to T-cell modulators.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-05, ISPOR 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 3 (May/June 2008)

Code

PSS2

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×