THE IMPACT OF CHANGES IN ADALIMUMAB, ETANERCEPT AND INFLIXIMAB DOSES ON THE COSTS OF TREATING RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Author(s)

Lawson RW1, Heatley RM1, Johnson KI1, Khandker RK2, Singh A21Complete Market Access, Macclesfield, United Kingdom, 2Pfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To review and analyse evidence on the changes in dose of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab over time in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the associated impact on treatment costs. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and NHS-EED were systematically searched to identify English language randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and observational studies published between January 1993 and December 2009. Conference abstracts were also hand searched from EULAR (2002 onwards) and ACR (2006 onwards). Studies were selected using predefined criteria, using two independent reviewers. Data pertaining to dose change were then analysed through pair-wise, random effects meta-analyses carried out in a frequentist framework with heterogeneity assessed using the I2 statistic. Associated cost data were extracted and the impact of change in dose on cost was investigated. RESULTS: Forty-five articles met the selection criteria with 23 containing dose change data and 26 containing cost data. A significantly greater proportion of patients on infliximab had a dose escalation compared to those on etanercept (odds ratio 0.17 95% CI 0.07, 0.43; p<0.001) or adalimumab (odds ratio 0.25 95% CI 0.2, 0.3; p<0.001). On average, 43.3% of infliximab patients, 7.3% of etanercept patients and 10.9% of adalimumab patients had their dose increased. RA related costs were on average 36% higher in patients who had their infliximab dose increased compared to 4% in patients on etanercept. No suitable data for adalimumab were available. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly greater proportion of infliximab patients required dose escalation compared to etanercept and adalimumab patients. There is some evidence to suggest that the escalation in dose required to maintain clinical benefit, results in substantially higher costs of treating RA.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PMS31

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×