THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LANTHANUM CARBONATE VS SEVELAMER HYDROCHLORIDE IN PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE

Author(s)

Park H1, Rascati KL1, Keith MS2, Hodgkins PS2, Smyth MD3, Goldsmith D4, Akehurst RL51The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 2Shire Pharmaceuticals, Wayne, PA, USA, 3Shire Pharmaceuticals, Basingstoke, United Kingdom, 4Guy's Hospital London, London, United Kingdom, 5The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness between two non-calcium binders, lanthanum carbonate (LC) and sevelamer hydrochloride (SH), in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients previously treated with calcium-based binders. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate incremental costs for three health outcomes: 1) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), 2) Life-years saved (LYS) and 3) percent who successfully met serum phosphorus (SP) level goals (3.5-5.5mg/dl) between the two non-Ca binders. The model incorporated patient-level data from a randomized head-to-head crossover study which compared the reduction of SP using fixed doses of LC for 4 weeks.  For this analysis the model included patients previously treated with calcium-based binders.  The ‘intent-to-treat’ (ITT) population and the ‘completer’ population were assessed.  Baseline risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD), overall mortality, and CVD mortality were derived from a large US epidemiological study. Utilities, costs and relative risks of CVD were derived from published sources. Patient outcomes were modeled for 10 years, and incremental cost-effective ratios (ICERs) were calculated for LC relative to SH. Clinical and economic outcomes were discounted at 5% per year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to test the model robustness. RESULTS: Using clinical results of patients previously treated with a calcium-based binder, for the ITT population, the ICERs were $24,724/QALY, $15,053/LYS and $6,700/additional success (i.e., SP goal achievement), respectively.  For patients who completed the randomized controlled trial, the ICERs of LC compared with SH were $15,285/QALY, $9,337/LYS and $8,265/additional success respectively. The PSAs indicated a 61.9% and 85.8% probability of LC being cost-effective at the $50,000/QALY threshold, for the ITT population and completer populations, respectively.  Sensitivity analyses support the robustness of the model results. CONCLUSIONS: LC is a cost-effective strategy compared to SH in ESRD patients previously treated with calcium-based binders. 

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PUK20

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×