COST UTILITY ANALYSIS OF ORPHAN DRUGS- CASE STUDY OF DUODENAL LEVODOPA INFUSION VERSUS STANDARD TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PARKINSON'S DISEASE IN SWEDEN

Author(s)

Willis M1, Gradl B21IHE, Lund, Sweden, 2Abbott Products Operations AG, Allschwil, Switzerland

BACKGROUND: Advanced Parkinson’s disease (APD) severely impacts the quality of life (QoL) for both patients and their caregiver and is associated with high health care and societal costs. The treatment options for those patients are limited. Duodenal levodopa infusion (DLI), an orphan drug, has shown to restore symptom control and to improve QoL substantially for both patients and their carers.   OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-utility of DLI versus standard treatment (including oral treatment and subcutaneous dopamine agonists) in patients with advanced PD in Sweden. METHODS: A stochastic Markov-based simulation model was developed. Health was described by 12 health states reflecting 4 categories of “OFF” time and 3 severity stages as measured by the Hoehn & Yahr scale. The clinical effect for both treatment arms was derived from published clinical trials; costs and QoL utilities were taken from an interim analysis of the ongoing DAPHNE study. The base case simulated 5 years with costs/effects discounted by 3%. The societal perspective was adopted.   RESULTS: The model estimated an improvement from 0.68 to 1.30 QALYs and a cost increase from 1,410,643 (€147,108) to SEK 1,674,295 (€174,603) for DLI versus standard treatment, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of around SEK 420,000 (€43,800) per QALY gained. The ICER for nearly 90% of the cohorts fell below SEK 655,000 (€68,306), the willingness-to-pay threshold often cited for Sweden [1]. Sensitivity analysis was associated with ICERs ranging up to SEK 900,000 (€93,856) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the data limitations, HE modeling in the orphan drug setting is challenging. Analysis could be performed as requested by Sweden’s Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (TLV), however, providing evidence that health benefits can provide good value for money even for an orphan population. DLI received a positive reimbursement recommendation by the TLV. [1] Persson U, Hjelmgren J (2003).

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PND27

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×