COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PREGABALIN VERSUS USUAL CARE IN REFRACTORY OUT-PATIENTS WITH NEUROPATIC PAIN FOLLOWED IN PRIMARY CARE SETTINGS

Author(s)

de Salas-Cansado M1, Pérez C2, Saldaña MT3, Navarro A4, Rejas J51Trial Form Support Spain, Madrid, Spain, 2Pain Clinic, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain, 3Primary Care Health Centre Raíces, Castrillón, Asturias, Spain, 4Primary Care Health Centre Puerta del Ángel, Madrid, Spain, 5Pfizer España, Alcobendas/Madrid, Spain

OBJECTIVES: Estimate the cost-effectiveness of Pregabalin (PGB) versus Usual Care (UC) in refractory out-patients with Neuropathic Pain (NeP) treated according to usual medical practice in Primary Care settings (PCS) in Spain. METHODS: Data extracted from a 12-week non-interventional prospective study conducted to ascertain the cost of NeP were used. PGB naïve patients treated with UC or PGB, matched by age (+5years), sex and pain intensity (+5pts), refractory (≥40VAS-McGill) to previous treatment during the prior 6 months, were selected in a 1:1 ratio. Patients could switch to PGB (monotherapy/add-on) or to UC (non-narcotics, opiates, antidepressants and/or anticonvulsants). Time horizon was 12 weeks. Effectiveness was quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gain. Perspectives of the National Health Service (NHS) and society (2006) were included, and expressed as an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). Bootstrapping techniques (10,000 re-samples) were used to obtain the probabilistic ICER, its 95% percentile confidence interval (CI) and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. RESULTS: A total of 160 patient-pairs were extracted. Compared with UC, PGB was associated with significantly higher QALY gain; 0.0374 ± 0.0367 vs. 0.0224 ± 0.0313 (p<0.001). Notably, although drug costs were higher for PGB (€251±125 vs. €104±121, p<0.001), its QALY gain did not incur a higher overall total cost (€1335±1302 vs. €1387±1489; p=0.587), nor higher health care costs (€529±438 vs. €560±672; p=0.628). In fact, the ICER was dominant for total and health care costs, with CIs respectively, dominant-€17,268, and dominant-€6,508. ICER for drug costs was €10,672/QALY (dominant-€19,858). The 99% of the re-samples were below the threshold of €30,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Versus usual care in the community medical setting, pregabalin is highly cost-effective in the treatment of refractory NeP patients. The high indirect costs and increased health care costs associated with the treatment of refractory patients, which offset higher cost of pregabalin, highlight the economic burden of the condition on society.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PSY40

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×