A COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS ON THE USE OF TRASTUZUMAB + ANASTROZOLE COMPARED TO LAPATINIB + LETROZOLE, LETROZOLE MONOTHERAPY OR ANASTROZOLE MONOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF HER2+ / HORMONE RECEPTOR POSITIVE (HR+) METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC) F ...
Author(s)
McNamara S1, Moore L1, Ray J21Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom, 2F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab/anastrozole compared to lapatinib/letrozole, anastrazole, and letrozole for the treatment of HER2+/HR+ mBC patients in whom treatment with an aromatase inhibitor is suitable from a UK NHS perspective. METHODS: An area under the curve model based on the TAnDEM (trastuzumab/anastrozole vs anastrozole) and EGF30008 (lapatinib/letrozole vs letrozole) RCTs and the findings of a mixed treatment comparison (MTC) conducted on endocrine treatments in HR+ mBC was developed in Excel. A rank preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) model was utilised to account for the 70% cross-over in TAnDEM. In the base-case no attempt to account for the sizeable additional imbalance in 2nd line chemotherapy was made. The anastrozole PFS and RPSFT-adjusted OS curves from TAnDEM were utilised as a baseline from which to implement the required indirect comparisons under the assumption of an AI ‘class effect’ (as suggested by expert clinical opinion and confirmed by the MTC). The present value of all costs and health outcomes attributable to each treatment option were calculated and the efficiency frontier defined. Extensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Anastrozole is dominated by letrozole. Lapatinib/letrozole is extendedly dominated by a combination of letrozole monotherapy and trastuzumab/anastrozole. Trastuzumab/anastrozole produced the most QALYs of all regimens. Trastuzumab/anastrozole and letrozole define the efficiency frontier with a base-case ICER of £54,336/QALY. The use of the utility values derived from EGF30008 caused this ICER to fall to £44,497/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Lapatinib/letrozole is not a cost-effective use of finite NHS resources at any cost-effectiveness threshold. As no attempt was made to account for the imbalance of 2nd line chemotherapy in TAnDEM (31% in anastrozole vs 8% for trastuzumab/anastrozole) and relatively conservative utility values were used within the model the base-case ICER of trastuzumab/anastrozole Vs letrozole (£54,336/QALY) should be regarded as conservative and the true ICER likely lies below £50,000/QALY gained.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)
Code
PCN97
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology