FURTHER VALIDITY EVIDENCES OF THE GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER – 7 SCALE (GAD-7)

Author(s)

Ruiz MA1, Zamorano E2, García-Campayo J3, Pardo A1, Freire O4, Rejas J41Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2Sant Antoni de Vilamajor Primary Care Center, ABS Alt Mogent, Barcelona, Spain, 3Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain, 4Pfizer Spain, Madrid, Spain

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship of severity levels of anxiety identified by the GAD-7 scale and the degree of disability as assessed by other standard widely used questionnaires. METHODS: A random sample of 212 subjects was recruited in Mental Health and Primary Care centres; 50% diagnosed of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) by DSM-IV criteria, and the other 50% were concurrent matched controls. In addition to the GAD-7, the following scales were also administered: Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and World Health Organization Disability Scale (WHO-DAS). The number of visits to primary care and specialized services were also measured. Correlations between scale scores were computed and also agreement between instrument-specific disability and severity levels. RESULTS: Strong and significant (p<0.001) correlations were found between GAD-7 scores and other questionnaires: HAM-A (r=0.852), HADS-A (r=0.903), WHO-DAS (r=0.704). Although GAD-7 scores correlated with all WHO-DAS dimensions, higher correlations were observed with Social Participation (r=0.741), Comprehension and Communication (r=0.679), and Labour (0.638) dimensions. Moderate but significant correlations were also found between GAD-7 scores and the number of visits to Primary Care (r=0.393) and Specialized Services (r=0.373). HAM-A severity groups presented significant differences in GAD-7 mean scores (F=205.3; df1=3; df2=208; p<0.001), and HAM severity groups also differed (F=175.3; df1=3; df2=208; p<0.001); in both cases all severity levels differed. CONCLUSIONS: The GAD-7 scale has shown to highly correlate not only with specific anxiety measures but also with disability measures. Not all WHO-DAS disability dimensions seem to be equally affected by GAD levels, and it has been shown that more severe GAD levels tend to demand more health attention. As the GAD-7 is self-administered and it is no time consuming, this instrument could be a good choice in primary care settings to explore the level of patient’s disability in subjects with GAD.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2009-10, ISPOR Europe 2009, Paris, France

Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 7 (October 2009)

Code

PMH59

Disease

Mental Health

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×