COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PREGABALIN VERSUS USUAL CARE IN DULOXETINE-REFRACTORY OUT-PATIENTS WITH GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER- AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION UNDER MEDICAL USUAL PRACTICE IN MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS

Author(s)

Carrasco JL1, Olivares JM2, Alvarez E3, de Salas M4, Rejas J51Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain, 2Hospital Meixoeiro - Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain, 3Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, 4Pfizer Spain, Alcobendas (Madrid), Spain, 5Pfizer Spain, Madrid, Spain

OBJECTIVES: To carry-out a 6-month cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the effect of Pregabalin (PGB) versus Usual Care (UC) in Duloxetine-refractory out-patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) treated according with usual medical practice in Mental Health Centers in Spain. METHODS: This CEA used secondary data extracted from a 6-month cohort prospective observational study (the ADAN study) designed to ascertain cost and health care resources utilization in subjects with GAD (DSM-IV criteria). Duloxetine-refractory subjects were defined as those who claimed of persistent symptoms of anxiety and showed suboptimal response (HAM-Anxiety scale≥16) after a course of standard doses of duloxetine for 6 month. At baseline, patients could switch to PGB, monotherapy or add-on, or to UC which could include ISRS/ISRN/other antidepressants, benzodiazepine, anti-epileptics different than PGB or a combination. Health outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gain by EQ-5D questionnaire. The perspective of CEA was that of a 3rd-payer in year 2009. Sensitivity analysis was performed by means of bootstrapping techniques (10000 re-samples were obtained) in order to obtain a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. RESULTS: A total of 132 duloxetin-refractory subjects (mean baseline HAM-A; 25.6 pts) were identified; 103 and 29 in the PGB and UC groups, respectively. Compared with UC, PGB therapy was associated with significant QALY gain after 6 months of treatment; 0.1191±0.1163 vs 0.0810±0.0777, p=0.043, but higher healthcare costs; €1,402.1±849.1 vs €1,051.5±789.1, p=0.048. The deterministic ICER ratio was €9,210 per QALY gained with a re-sampling ICER of €11,234 (95 CI: 1,591-20,877). The 90% of re-samples fold below €20,513 threshold and 95% below €29,901.   CONCLUSIONS:   Despite the small sample and observational design, this evaluation could suggest that pregabalin may be cost-effective in comparison with usual care in duloxetine-refractory subjects with Generalized Anxiety Disorders managed in Mental Health Centers under usual medical practice in Spain.   

Conference/Value in Health Info

2009-10, ISPOR Europe 2009, Paris, France

Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 7 (October 2009)

Code

PMH37

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×