IMPACT OF CATHETER ABLATION VERSUS ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUGS ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
Author(s)
Veronika Bulkova, MSc, Electrophysiologist Technician1, Martin Fiala, MD, PhD, Electrophysiologist2, Dan Wichterle, MD, PhD, Electrophysiologist1, Ludek Haman, MD, PhD, Electrophysiologist3, Jan Chovancik, MD, Electrophysiologist2, Jan Simek, MD, PhD, Electrophysiologist1, Petr Parizek, MD, PhD, Eletrophysiologist3, Dorota Wojnarova, BSc, Electrophysiologist Technician2, Stepan Havranek, MD, PhD, Eletrophysiologist11Department of Cardiology and Angiology, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University School in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; 2 Department of Cardiology, Hospital Podlesi, Trinec, Czech Republic; 3 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to compare quality of life (QoL) between patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated medically and patients who underwent catheter ablation. METHODS: The study group consisted of 363 pts (104 females, aged 63±11 years), who were admitted to 3 hospitals within a period of 6 months. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment modality: 243 patients were treated medically (group 1), and 120 patients underwent catheter ablation (1.2 procedures per patient) (group 2). All patients filled in a questionnaire of QoL EQ-5D at baseline and 1 year after the index hospitalization. Subjective QoL was evaluated using the 0-100% scale. Objective QoL was assessed using the set of VAS RESULTS: Baseline subjective QoL was 54±14% in group 1 vs. 63±11% in group 2 (P <0.001). Baseline objective QoL was 59±14% in group 1 vs. 66±12% in group 2 (P <0.001). After 1 year, subjective QoL improved to 58±18% in group 1, and to 78±14% in group 2 (P <0.001). Objective QoL improved to 63±16% in group 1, and to 84±14% in group 2 (P <0.001). When the patients in groups 1 and 2 were asked to compare their current heath status with that one year ago, they responded as follows: much better - 8 (3%) vs. 64 (53%), (P <0.001); slightly better - 35 (14%) vs. 37 (31%), (P <0.01); same - 57 (24%) vs. 16 (13%), (P =0.08); slightly worse - 117 (48%) vs. 3 (3%), (P <0.001); and much worse - 26 (11%) vs. 0, (P = <0.001).CONCLUSIONS: One year after the index hospital admission for AF, significant increase in subjective and objective QoL was observed in patients who underwent catheter ablation compared to the patients treated medically.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2008-11, ISPOR Europe 2008, Athens, Greece
Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 6 (November 2008)
Code
PCV91
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders
Explore Related HEOR by Topic