EFFECTS OF DOSING REGIMEN ON MEDICATION USE BEHAVIOR IN MEDICAID ENROLLED TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS

Author(s)

Rajesh Balkrishnan, PhD, Professor1, Sujata S Jayawant, MS, Doctoral Student2, Bhakti Arondekar, PhD, MBA, US Health Outcomes Manager3, Veronioque Lacombe, PhD, Assistant Professor1, Eric Seiber, PhD, Assistant Professor11The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; 2 The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus, OH, USA; 3 GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess patients’ medication adherence associated with changes in dosing regimen (monotherapy (MONO), dual therapy (DUAL), and fixed-dose combination therapy (FDCT)) in type 2 diabetics. METHODS: This study utilized a retrospective cohort of Medicaid enrollees from eight states with type 2 diabetes newly starting antidiabetic therapy. Patients were followed for 12 months after initiation of index dosing regimen (MONO, DUAL, or FDCT) and 12 months after early change in dosing regimen (DUAL or FDCT). Demographic characteristics and pharmacy records were extracted for eligible patients. Prescription refill patterns were used to calculate Medication Possession Ratio (MPR). To compare changes in adherence before and after a change in the dosing regimen, Pre- and Post-index MPR were calculated. Differences in MPR and demographics between groups were analyzed using T-tests and ANOVA for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: There were 10,749 patients in the study cohort including 8,528 (79.4%) MONO, 1,558 (14.5%) DUAL, and 663 (6.2%) FDCT patients. No significant different in distribution of age was found across the three groups. Among the 1318 patients who changed their therapy, 809 (61.4%) had an augmentation to DUAL and 509 (38.6%) switched to FDCT. Mean MPR for the entire cohort was 0.81. ANOVA indicated that medication adherence rates were significantly different across MONO, DUAL, and FDCT dosing regimens (p <0.001). Patients on dual therapy had significantly higher MPR rate (0.91) as compared to patients on the other regimens. Patients switching to FDCT had significantly lower pre-index MPR than patients augmenting to dual therapy (p-value <0.01). Patients switching to FDCT also had significantly lower post-index MPR than the augmentation patients (p-value <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients, health care providers like physicians, pharmacists, and Medicaid programs can collaborate together to devise strategies to improve patient medication adherence and other outcomes.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-11, ISPOR Europe 2008, Athens, Greece

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 6 (November 2008)

Code

PDB64

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Specialized Treatment Areas, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Personalized & Precision Medicine, Post Marketing Studies, Prescribing Behavior

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×