COSTS AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (PRO) IN GERMAN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KNEE AND HIP PAIN

Author(s)

Lusine Breitscheidel, Dr, Assistant Project Leader1, Kathrin Kreyenberg, Dr, Project Leader1, Elmar Stridde, Dr, Manager2, Florian Eichmann, PhD, Assistant Director Health Economics11Kendle GmbH, Munich, Germany; 2 Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate costs related to health care resource use and PRO in German patients with chronic knee and/or hip pain, specifically for guideline-, non-guideline- and self-treatment-groups. METHODS: Patients (n=126) were consecutively recruited by physicians in general practice (n=49) in 2005 and categorized into the three groups (n=61 self-treatment, n=19 guideline-, n=46 non-guideline-groups). PRO were assessed by SF-36, von Korff Index, and Patient Health Questionnaire Depression (PHQ-D) questionnaires at time of enrollment. Resource utilization data was collected retrospectively for six months. Groups were compared using multivariate general linear modeling (GLM). RESULTS: Participants had an average duration of knee and/or hip pain of about 5.4 years, were on average 60 years old, predominantly females (71%), overweight (mean BMI 27.8 kg/m2) and unemployed (69%). Patients with self-treatment were younger compared to guideline- or non-guideline patients (54.4 vs. 63.7 vs. 65.5 years, mean age, p=0.0070). Regarding SF-36, von Korff Index, and PHQ-D (with exception of major depressive symptoms) the groups were similar. Mean total societal perspective costs per patient were €210.22 [95%CI 77.47; 342.97] vs. €2886.07 [95%CI 107.93; 5664.21] vs. €1087.50 [95%CI 600.73; 1574.27] (self-treatment- vs. guideline- vs. non-guideline-group, respectively, p=0.0686, adjusted by age and employment status). The major cost factors were: in the self-treatment-group, hospitalizations, remedies, and sport activities (29.3%, 27.9%, and 21.9% of the mean total cost per patient, respectively); in the guideline-group, hospitalizations, sick leaves, and remedies (25.8%, 24.6%, and 19.6%, respectively); and for the non-guideline-group, remedies, hospitalizations, and visits to physicians (19.8%, 19.0%, and 13.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PRO in patients with chronic knee and/or hip pain are worse compared to the general reference population in Germany. However, PRO and societal mean total adjusted costs per patient with knee and/or hip pain are comparable among guideline-, non-guideline- and self-treatment-groups.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-11, ISPOR Europe 2008, Athens, Greece

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 6 (November 2008)

Code

PSY34

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×