CHANGING THE SURGICAL WOUND CLOSURE MANAGEMENT PATHWAY- TIME AND SUPPLIES WITH PRINEO VS. STANDARD OF CARE FOR ABDOMINOPLASTY SURGERY IN GERMANY

Author(s)

Erwin De Cock, MSc, Senior Research Associate1, Floortje Van Nooten, MSc, Research Associate2, Klaus Müller, MD, Chefarzt3, Robert Tan, MBChB, Manager41United BioSource Corporation, Barcelona, Spain; 2 United BioSource Corporation, Brussels, Flanders, Belgium; 3 ASKLEPIOS Klinik Wandsbek, Hamburg, Germany; 4 Ethicon, Livingston, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: PRINEO® Skin Closure System (PRINEO) offers effective and safe wound closure compared to conventional suture techniques i.e. Standard of Care (SOC). The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in health resource utilization attributable to PRINEO vs. SOC for abdominoplasty surgery. METHODS: A time and motion study was conducted in one centre in Germany. Trained centre staff collected ten observations (five for PRINEO and five for SOC) following the patient from surgery through post op care. Data Observation Forms were designed based on information obtained from staff interviews. Surgical wound closure and management activities were observed for which differences in time and resource use between PRINEO and SOC were expected: incision closure time, dressing applications, and dressing changes (during admission and post-discharge return). RESULTS: Average time for skin layer closure was 2.11 min for PRINEO vs. 13.01 min for SOC. Average wound length was 46.4 cm vs. 52.6 cm, respectively. This translates into a speed of closure of 4.04 cm/min for SOC vs. 21.97 cm/min with PRINEO. Average time for wound closure (dermal and skin layer) was 24.85 min (PRINEO) compared to 34.05 min (SOC). The SOC treatment arm incurred 2.94 min and 4.32 min for dressing application and post-operative dressing changes, respectively.  PRINEO did not require any dressing. Additionally, use of PRINEO resulted in elimination of suture closure materials which on average included 2 strands of Monocryl 2-0 sutures, 2 polydioxanone sutures, 13.6 Cosmopor adhesive dressings, 12 strips of adhesive tapes, and 7.4 gauze swabs. One PRINEO unit was required. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PRINEO resulted in increased skin closure speed and avoided final skin layer closure and aftercare management of the wound in terms of dressing application and changes. Concomitant to the savings in personnel time was a reduction in surgical supply materials.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-11, ISPOR Europe 2008, Athens, Greece

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 6 (November 2008)

Code

PHC13

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Surgery

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×